Skip to content

build(deps): bump charm.land/lipgloss/v2 from 2.0.2 to 2.0.3#782

Merged
intel352 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/go_modules/charm.land/lipgloss/v2-2.0.3
May 26, 2026
Merged

build(deps): bump charm.land/lipgloss/v2 from 2.0.2 to 2.0.3#782
intel352 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/go_modules/charm.land/lipgloss/v2-2.0.3

Conversation

@dependabot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github May 25, 2026

Bumps charm.land/lipgloss/v2 from 2.0.2 to 2.0.3.

Release notes

Sourced from charm.land/lipgloss/v2's releases.

v2.0.3

Changelog

Fixed

  • 472d718e2314596549bee2c0c8ccf8beea5f25ae: fix: Avoid background color query hang (#636) (@​jedevc)

Docs


Thoughts? Questions? We love hearing from you. Feel free to reach out on X, Discord, Slack, The Fediverse, Bluesky.

Commits
  • 472d718 fix: Avoid background color query hang (#636)
  • 89fafba chore: bump x/ansi to v0.11.7 to fix width calculation bug
  • d6d41e1 chore(deps): bump golang.org/x/sys in the all group (#663)
  • 23a1bb1 chore(deps): bump github.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorful in the all group (#640)
  • cd93a9f docs: fix tree comment typo (#634)
  • 25c5fb2 chore(deps): bump github.com/charmbracelet/colorprofile in the all group (#630)
  • 9e39a0a docs: fix README typo (#629)
  • See full diff in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [charm.land/lipgloss/v2](https://github.com/charmbracelet/lipgloss) from 2.0.2 to 2.0.3.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/charmbracelet/lipgloss/releases)
- [Commits](charmbracelet/lipgloss@v2.0.2...v2.0.3)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: charm.land/lipgloss/v2
  dependency-version: 2.0.3
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot Bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file go Pull requests that update go code labels May 25, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

⏱ Benchmark Results

No significant performance regressions detected.

benchstat comparison (baseline → PR)
## benchstat: baseline → PR
baseline-bench.txt:282: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
baseline-bench.txt:276361: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
baseline-bench.txt:602822: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
baseline-bench.txt:924684: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
baseline-bench.txt:1198000: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
baseline-bench.txt:1500560: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
benchmark-results.txt:282: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
benchmark-results.txt:288313: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
benchmark-results.txt:577340: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
benchmark-results.txt:841530: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
benchmark-results.txt:1138345: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
benchmark-results.txt:1442951: parsing iteration count: invalid syntax
goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: github.com/GoCodeAlone/workflow/dynamic
cpu: AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor                
                            │ baseline-bench.txt │       benchmark-results.txt        │
                            │       sec/op       │    sec/op     vs base              │
InterpreterCreation-4               6.835m ± 68%   8.916m ± 62%       ~ (p=0.589 n=6)
ComponentLoad-4                     3.593m ±  8%   3.821m ±  4%  +6.34% (p=0.026 n=6)
ComponentExecute-4                  1.945µ ±  2%   1.973µ ±  2%       ~ (p=0.180 n=6)
PoolContention/workers-1-4          1.095µ ±  3%   1.110µ ±  2%       ~ (p=0.420 n=6)
PoolContention/workers-2-4          1.105µ ±  4%   1.113µ ±  3%       ~ (p=0.494 n=6)
PoolContention/workers-4-4          1.092µ ±  1%   1.080µ ±  1%  -1.10% (p=0.002 n=6)
PoolContention/workers-8-4          1.089µ ±  1%   1.085µ ±  1%       ~ (p=0.418 n=6)
PoolContention/workers-16-4         1.093µ ±  1%   1.101µ ±  6%       ~ (p=0.223 n=6)
ComponentLifecycle-4                3.595m ±  1%   3.772m ±  1%  +4.91% (p=0.002 n=6)
SourceValidation-4                  2.328µ ±  0%   2.401µ ±  1%  +3.14% (p=0.002 n=6)
RegistryConcurrent-4                771.1n ±  3%   810.0n ±  3%  +5.03% (p=0.009 n=6)
LoaderLoadFromString-4              3.609m ±  1%   3.757m ±  8%  +4.09% (p=0.004 n=6)
geomean                             18.63µ         19.46µ        +4.46%

                            │ baseline-bench.txt │        benchmark-results.txt         │
                            │        B/op        │     B/op      vs base                │
InterpreterCreation-4               2.027Mi ± 0%   2.027Mi ± 0%       ~ (p=0.699 n=6)
ComponentLoad-4                     2.180Mi ± 0%   2.180Mi ± 0%       ~ (p=0.409 n=6)
ComponentExecute-4                  1.203Ki ± 0%   1.203Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-1-4          1.203Ki ± 0%   1.203Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-2-4          1.203Ki ± 0%   1.203Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-4-4          1.203Ki ± 0%   1.203Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-8-4          1.203Ki ± 0%   1.203Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-16-4         1.203Ki ± 0%   1.203Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
ComponentLifecycle-4                2.183Mi ± 0%   2.183Mi ± 0%       ~ (p=0.937 n=6)
SourceValidation-4                  1.984Ki ± 0%   1.984Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
RegistryConcurrent-4                1.133Ki ± 0%   1.133Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
LoaderLoadFromString-4              2.182Mi ± 0%   2.182Mi ± 0%       ~ (p=0.485 n=6)
geomean                             15.25Ki        15.25Ki       +0.00%
¹ all samples are equal

                            │ baseline-bench.txt │        benchmark-results.txt        │
                            │     allocs/op      │  allocs/op   vs base                │
InterpreterCreation-4                15.68k ± 0%   15.68k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6)
ComponentLoad-4                      18.02k ± 0%   18.02k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6)
ComponentExecute-4                    25.00 ± 0%    25.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-1-4            25.00 ± 0%    25.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-2-4            25.00 ± 0%    25.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-4-4            25.00 ± 0%    25.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-8-4            25.00 ± 0%    25.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
PoolContention/workers-16-4           25.00 ± 0%    25.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
ComponentLifecycle-4                 18.07k ± 0%   18.07k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
SourceValidation-4                    32.00 ± 0%    32.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
RegistryConcurrent-4                  2.000 ± 0%    2.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
LoaderLoadFromString-4               18.06k ± 0%   18.06k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
geomean                               183.3         183.3       +0.00%
¹ all samples are equal

pkg: github.com/GoCodeAlone/workflow/middleware
                                  │ baseline-bench.txt │       benchmark-results.txt       │
                                  │       sec/op       │   sec/op     vs base              │
CircuitBreakerDetection-4                  285.9n ± 4%   290.3n ± 4%       ~ (p=0.093 n=6)
CircuitBreakerExecution_Success-4          21.43n ± 1%   21.52n ± 2%       ~ (p=0.225 n=6)
CircuitBreakerExecution_Failure-4          66.20n ± 0%   66.47n ± 1%  +0.42% (p=0.041 n=6)
geomean                                    74.03n        74.61n       +0.78%

                                  │ baseline-bench.txt │       benchmark-results.txt        │
                                  │        B/op        │    B/op     vs base                │
CircuitBreakerDetection-4                 144.0 ± 0%     144.0 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
CircuitBreakerExecution_Success-4         0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
CircuitBreakerExecution_Failure-4         0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
geomean                                              ²               +0.00%               ²
¹ all samples are equal
² summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

                                  │ baseline-bench.txt │       benchmark-results.txt        │
                                  │     allocs/op      │ allocs/op   vs base                │
CircuitBreakerDetection-4                 1.000 ± 0%     1.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
CircuitBreakerExecution_Success-4         0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
CircuitBreakerExecution_Failure-4         0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
geomean                                              ²               +0.00%               ²
¹ all samples are equal
² summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

pkg: github.com/GoCodeAlone/workflow/module
                                 │ baseline-bench.txt │        benchmark-results.txt        │
                                 │       sec/op       │    sec/op     vs base               │
IaCStateBackend_InProcess-4              308.6n ±  1%   313.7n ± 30%   +1.64% (p=0.002 n=6)
IaCStateBackend_GRPC-4                   9.519m ± 11%   9.759m ±  4%        ~ (p=0.394 n=6)
JQTransform_Simple-4                     647.1n ± 40%   698.4n ± 39%        ~ (p=0.180 n=6)
JQTransform_ObjectConstruction-4         1.511µ ±  1%   1.633µ ±  3%   +8.11% (p=0.002 n=6)
JQTransform_ArraySelect-4                3.446µ ±  1%   3.796µ ±  0%  +10.14% (p=0.002 n=6)
JQTransform_Complex-4                    38.89µ ±  2%   41.57µ ±  0%   +6.90% (p=0.002 n=6)
JQTransform_Throughput-4                 1.864µ ±  1%   1.988µ ±  2%   +6.68% (p=0.002 n=6)
SSEPublishDelivery-4                     64.55n ±  0%   64.63n ±  1%        ~ (p=0.773 n=6)
geomean                                  3.830µ         4.039µ         +5.45%

                                 │ baseline-bench.txt │         benchmark-results.txt         │
                                 │        B/op        │     B/op       vs base                │
IaCStateBackend_InProcess-4             416.0 ±  0%       416.0 ±  0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
IaCStateBackend_GRPC-4                5.946Mi ± 15%     5.768Mi ± 15%       ~ (p=0.485 n=6)
JQTransform_Simple-4                  1.273Ki ±  0%     1.273Ki ±  0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
JQTransform_ObjectConstruction-4      1.773Ki ±  0%     1.773Ki ±  0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
JQTransform_ArraySelect-4             2.625Ki ±  0%     2.625Ki ±  0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
JQTransform_Complex-4                 16.22Ki ±  0%     16.22Ki ±  0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
JQTransform_Throughput-4              1.984Ki ±  0%     1.984Ki ±  0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
SSEPublishDelivery-4                    0.000 ±  0%       0.000 ±  0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
geomean                                             ²                  -0.38%               ²
¹ all samples are equal
² summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

                                 │ baseline-bench.txt │        benchmark-results.txt        │
                                 │     allocs/op      │  allocs/op   vs base                │
IaCStateBackend_InProcess-4              2.000 ± 0%      2.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
IaCStateBackend_GRPC-4                  6.838k ± 0%     6.845k ± 0%       ~ (p=0.675 n=6)
JQTransform_Simple-4                     10.00 ± 0%      10.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
JQTransform_ObjectConstruction-4         15.00 ± 0%      15.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
JQTransform_ArraySelect-4                30.00 ± 0%      30.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
JQTransform_Complex-4                    324.0 ± 0%      324.0 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
JQTransform_Throughput-4                 17.00 ± 0%      17.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
SSEPublishDelivery-4                     0.000 ± 0%      0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
geomean                                             ²                +0.01%               ²
¹ all samples are equal
² summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

pkg: github.com/GoCodeAlone/workflow/schema
                                    │ baseline-bench.txt │       benchmark-results.txt       │
                                    │       sec/op       │   sec/op     vs base              │
SchemaValidation_Simple-4                   1.115µ ± 12%   1.113µ ± 2%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6)
SchemaValidation_AllFields-4                1.697µ ±  3%   1.700µ ± 3%       ~ (p=0.937 n=6)
SchemaValidation_FormatValidation-4         1.610µ ±  2%   1.603µ ± 1%       ~ (p=0.461 n=6)
SchemaValidation_ManySchemas-4              1.832µ ±  3%   1.812µ ± 3%       ~ (p=0.368 n=6)
geomean                                     1.537µ         1.531µ       -0.36%

                                    │ baseline-bench.txt │       benchmark-results.txt        │
                                    │        B/op        │    B/op     vs base                │
SchemaValidation_Simple-4                   0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
SchemaValidation_AllFields-4                0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
SchemaValidation_FormatValidation-4         0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
SchemaValidation_ManySchemas-4              0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
geomean                                                ²               +0.00%               ²
¹ all samples are equal
² summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

                                    │ baseline-bench.txt │       benchmark-results.txt        │
                                    │     allocs/op      │ allocs/op   vs base                │
SchemaValidation_Simple-4                   0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
SchemaValidation_AllFields-4                0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
SchemaValidation_FormatValidation-4         0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
SchemaValidation_ManySchemas-4              0.000 ± 0%     0.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
geomean                                                ²               +0.00%               ²
¹ all samples are equal
² summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

pkg: github.com/GoCodeAlone/workflow/store
                                   │ baseline-bench.txt │       benchmark-results.txt        │
                                   │       sec/op       │    sec/op     vs base              │
EventStoreAppend_InMemory-4                1.175µ ± 26%   1.207µ ±  8%       ~ (p=0.937 n=6)
EventStoreAppend_SQLite-4                  1.464m ±  6%   1.410m ±  7%       ~ (p=0.180 n=6)
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-10-4           13.64µ ±  3%   14.50µ ±  4%  +6.30% (p=0.004 n=6)
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-50-4           73.33µ ± 17%   79.00µ ± 17%       ~ (p=0.065 n=6)
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-100-4          123.0µ ±  0%   127.6µ ±  1%  +3.79% (p=0.002 n=6)
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-500-4          634.3µ ±  1%   659.9µ ±  1%  +4.03% (p=0.002 n=6)
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-1000-4         1.290m ±  0%   1.336m ±  2%  +3.53% (p=0.002 n=6)
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-10-4             106.5µ ±  1%   111.3µ ±  1%  +4.47% (p=0.002 n=6)
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-50-4             248.4µ ±  2%   263.2µ ±  0%  +5.95% (p=0.002 n=6)
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-100-4            420.8µ ±  2%   447.6µ ±  1%  +6.37% (p=0.002 n=6)
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-500-4            1.795m ±  0%   1.940m ±  1%  +8.12% (p=0.002 n=6)
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-1000-4           3.500m ±  1%   3.737m ±  2%  +6.77% (p=0.002 n=6)
geomean                                    218.9µ         229.0µ        +4.63%

                                   │ baseline-bench.txt │        benchmark-results.txt         │
                                   │        B/op        │     B/op      vs base                │
EventStoreAppend_InMemory-4                 788.0 ± 10%     809.0 ± 5%       ~ (p=0.699 n=6)
EventStoreAppend_SQLite-4                 1.981Ki ±  3%   1.984Ki ± 2%       ~ (p=0.281 n=6)
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-10-4          7.953Ki ±  0%   7.953Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-50-4          46.62Ki ±  0%   46.62Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-100-4         94.48Ki ±  0%   94.48Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-500-4         472.8Ki ±  0%   472.8Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6)
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-1000-4        944.3Ki ±  0%   944.3Ki ± 0%  -0.00% (p=0.011 n=6)
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-10-4            16.74Ki ±  0%   16.74Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-50-4            87.14Ki ±  0%   87.14Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-100-4           175.4Ki ±  0%   175.4Ki ± 0%       ~ (p=0.455 n=6)
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-500-4           846.1Ki ±  0%   846.1Ki ± 0%  +0.00% (p=0.022 n=6)
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-1000-4          1.639Mi ±  0%   1.639Mi ± 0%  -0.00% (p=0.002 n=6)
geomean                                   67.32Ki         67.48Ki       +0.23%
¹ all samples are equal

                                   │ baseline-bench.txt │        benchmark-results.txt        │
                                   │     allocs/op      │  allocs/op   vs base                │
EventStoreAppend_InMemory-4                  7.000 ± 0%    7.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
EventStoreAppend_SQLite-4                    53.00 ± 0%    53.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-10-4             125.0 ± 0%    125.0 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-50-4             653.0 ± 0%    653.0 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-100-4           1.306k ± 0%   1.306k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-500-4           6.514k ± 0%   6.514k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_InMemory/events-1000-4          13.02k ± 0%   13.02k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-10-4               382.0 ± 0%    382.0 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-50-4              1.852k ± 0%   1.852k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-100-4             3.681k ± 0%   3.681k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-500-4             18.54k ± 0%   18.54k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
GetTimeline_SQLite/events-1000-4            37.29k ± 0%   37.29k ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=6) ¹
geomean                                     1.162k        1.162k       +0.00%
¹ all samples are equal

Benchmarks run with go test -bench=. -benchmem -count=6.
Regressions ≥ 20% are flagged. Results compared via benchstat.

@intel352 intel352 merged commit 157d149 into main May 26, 2026
24 of 25 checks passed
@intel352 intel352 deleted the dependabot/go_modules/charm.land/lipgloss/v2-2.0.3 branch May 26, 2026 08:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file go Pull requests that update go code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant