Implement LOGOMATIC at the Project Level
#80
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dchansen06
added
Documentation
Contributor
Author
|
Confirmed by @PeterShillingsburg to work |
- Created new project files for STM32G474 including main.c, interrupt handlers, and HAL MSP initialization. - Implemented system calls and memory management functions. - Configured system clock settings and GPIO initialization. - Added README.md for project setup instructions. - Updated CMakeLists.txt to include the new G4HELLO project.
dchansen06
force-pushed
the
ImplementLogomatic
branch
from
9f38b91 to
833c29d
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolves #68 and enables serial logging using the
LOGOMATICmacroAlso does small clean-up of related areas
Also adds tests for the logging (
G4HELLOand HOOTL testing)Very similar to how ECU-25 handled logging
Once #60 or #55 or something is merged in then this may have to be expanded to support it, but without a way to test that functionality that bridge will be crossed then.