Skip to content

fix(automation): drop BSP wording in QR-trigger explainer#43

Merged
sathyaprakash000 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/qr-trigger-copy
May 26, 2026
Merged

fix(automation): drop BSP wording in QR-trigger explainer#43
sathyaprakash000 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/qr-trigger-copy

Conversation

@sathyaprakash000
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Why

The QR-code trigger explainer in AutomationBuilderView.jsx:1904 said:

...WhatsApp doesn't know it came from a QR; the BSP attributes it via the pre-filled text.

Forgemind is a Meta Business Partner, not a WhatsApp BSP. "BSP" is the WhatsApp Business Solution Provider tier — a different program with different obligations. Naming us a BSP in user-facing copy both overstates our relationship with Meta and is confusing for self-hosters.

What changed

AutomationBuilderView.jsx:1904 — "the BSP attributes it" → "ForgeChat attributes it". The new wording is also clearer about what is doing the attribution.

The internal source: "bsp" enum values at lines 1920/1926/1932 are untouched — they're not user-facing (only the sourceLabel strings are) and renaming the enum risks breaking unknown call sites. Brand compliance doesn't require it.

1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Test plan

  • CI green
  • Open Automations → New → QR trigger; confirm the explainer renders the new copy

ForgeChat is not a WhatsApp BSP; we are a Meta Business Partner. The
QR-code trigger description in the automation builder said "the BSP
attributes it via the pre-filled text", which is both incorrect about
our partner status and confusing to users. Reword to "ForgeChat
attributes it via the pre-filled text" so the explainer correctly
names the actor doing the attribution.

Signed-off-by: KingArthur000 <sathyaprakashelango@gmail.com>
@sathyaprakash000 sathyaprakash000 merged commit 44946b0 into main May 26, 2026
11 checks passed
@sathyaprakash000 sathyaprakash000 deleted the fix/qr-trigger-copy branch May 26, 2026 06:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant