-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
Add engineering levels documentation #4720
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
allthedoll
wants to merge
2
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
allthedoll/engineering-levels
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+200
−0
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
200 changes: 200 additions & 0 deletions
200
src/handbook/peopleops/job-descriptions/engineering-levels.md
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,200 @@ | ||
| # FlowFuse Engineering Levels | ||
|
|
||
| ## Purpose | ||
|
|
||
| This document defines expectations for Engineers at FlowFuse. | ||
|
|
||
| It exists to: | ||
|
|
||
| - Clarify what strong performance looks like | ||
| - Define scope at each level | ||
| - Support evidence-based quarterly reviews | ||
| - Make promotion decisions predictable and defensible | ||
|
|
||
| This applies to: | ||
|
|
||
| - Software Engineers, including the CTO when operating as an engineer | ||
| - Infrastructure Engineers | ||
|
|
||
| Levels reflect scope of ownership and influence. | ||
|
|
||
| "Meets Expectations" at a level represents strong performance. | ||
|
|
||
| Promotion requires sustained demonstration of next-level behaviors. | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| # Core Dimensions | ||
|
|
||
| All Engineers are evaluated across five dimensions. | ||
|
|
||
| ## 1. Technical Craft | ||
|
|
||
| Quality, maintainability, and soundness of engineering work. | ||
|
|
||
| Examples: | ||
| - Code quality and architectural decisions | ||
| - Infrastructure design and automation | ||
| - Security and reliability posture | ||
| - Testing rigor and maintainability | ||
| - Clear technical documentation | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| ## 2. Ownership and Impact | ||
|
|
||
| Reliable delivery of meaningful engineering outcomes. | ||
|
|
||
| Examples: | ||
| - Delivering committed work predictably | ||
| - Converting ambiguity into executable plans | ||
| - Driving measurable improvements | ||
| - Following through on commitments | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| ## 3. System Thinking | ||
|
|
||
| Understanding and improving the broader engineering system. | ||
|
|
||
| Examples: | ||
| - Anticipating cross-service dependencies | ||
| - Identifying architectural risk | ||
| - Improving operational patterns | ||
| - Designing for long-term maintainability | ||
| - Reducing systemic friction | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| ## 4. Collaboration and Influence | ||
|
|
||
| Working effectively with other engineers and amplifying impact through others. | ||
|
|
||
| Examples: | ||
| - Clear technical communication | ||
| - Constructive code review | ||
| - Mentorship | ||
| - Cross-team alignment | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| ## 5. Ecosystem Stewardship | ||
|
|
||
| Responsible contribution to the health of our open source and user ecosystem. | ||
|
|
||
| Examples: | ||
| - Professional engagement in public channels | ||
| - Addressing community-reported issues in owned areas | ||
| - Improving documentation and error clarity | ||
| - Reducing recurring ecosystem friction | ||
|
|
||
| Community work is considered real work and should be planned and visible. | ||
|
|
||
| # Levels | ||
|
|
||
| Levels represent increasing scope of ownership and influence. | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| ## Level 1 - Guided Contributor | ||
|
|
||
| Scope: Well-defined tasks within a team. | ||
|
|
||
| Demonstrates: | ||
|
|
||
| - Delivers assigned work reliably with guidance | ||
| - Provides honest time estimates with guidance and flags when work is at risk of slipping | ||
| - Produces maintainable work aligned with standards | ||
| - Understands local systems and dependencies | ||
| - Engages constructively in feedback | ||
| - Acts professionally in ecosystem interactions | ||
|
|
||
| Promotion to Level 2 requires: | ||
| - Independent ownership of moderately complex work | ||
| - Reduced reliance on step-by-step direction | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| ## Level 2 - Independent Owner | ||
|
|
||
| Scope: Features, services, or infrastructure components. | ||
|
|
||
| Demonstrates: | ||
|
|
||
| - Independently scopes and delivers moderately complex work | ||
| - Estimates moderately complex work accurately; raises blockers proactively rather than at deadline | ||
| - Anticipates and mitigates local risks | ||
| - Improves local system quality | ||
| - Participates meaningfully in planning and estimation | ||
| - Handles ecosystem issues in owned areas | ||
|
|
||
| Promotion to Level 3 requires: | ||
| - Ownership of complex systems or multi-sprint initiatives | ||
| - Evidence of mentoring or influence beyond individual contribution | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| ## Level 3 - Domain Leader | ||
|
|
||
| Scope: Major systems, critical infrastructure domains, or multi-person initiatives. | ||
|
|
||
| A Level 3 engineer operates as a force multiplier within Engineering. | ||
|
|
||
| Demonstrates: | ||
|
|
||
| - Independently designs and delivers complex systems or initiatives | ||
| - Maintains reliable throughput within planned capacity and improves estimation | ||
| - Owns a meaningful engineering domain, whether application, infrastructure, or operational | ||
| - Anticipates cross-team impact and prevents downstream issues | ||
| - Elevates the quality of others through code review and mentorship | ||
| - Improves architectural or operational patterns | ||
| - Identifies recurring ecosystem or reliability friction and drives reduction | ||
|
|
||
| Level 3 performance requires sustained domain-level impact, not isolated strong projects. | ||
|
|
||
| Promotion to Level 4 requires: | ||
| - Sustained cross-team technical influence | ||
| - Strategic impact beyond a single domain | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| ## Level 4 - Cross-Team Strategist | ||
|
|
||
| Scope: Multiple teams or core engineering domains. | ||
|
|
||
| Demonstrates: | ||
|
|
||
| - Shapes technical direction across teams | ||
| - Models and reinforces commitment discipline across team; identifies systemic patterns in estimation drift and drives structural fixes | ||
| - Drives systemic reliability or architectural improvements | ||
| - Influences roadmap through engineering insight | ||
| - Leads resolution of major production or architectural challenges | ||
| - Strengthens company credibility in the engineering ecosystem | ||
|
|
||
| Promotion to Level 5 requires: | ||
| - Multi-quarter strategic impact | ||
| - Ensures the organization maintains healthy throughput and delivery trust at scale; sets the standard for how engineering commitments are made and communicated company-wide | ||
| - Organization-level engineering leadership | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| ## Level 5 - Organizational Authority | ||
|
|
||
| Scope: Company-wide engineering direction. | ||
|
|
||
| Demonstrates: | ||
|
|
||
| - Defines multi-year engineering strategy | ||
| - Makes high-impact architectural tradeoffs | ||
| - Elevates engineering standards across the organization | ||
| - Represents FlowFuse engineering at an industry level | ||
| - Drives operational excellence company-wide | ||
|
|
||
| This level is rare and not time-based. | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| # Performance and Reviews | ||
|
|
||
| Quarterly reviews: | ||
|
|
||
| - Gather evidence against each core dimension | ||
| - Identify demonstrated level behaviors | ||
| - Identify next-level behaviors to develop | ||
|
|
||
| Annual reviews: | ||
|
|
||
| - Synthesize quarterly evidence | ||
| - Evaluate sustained scope and impact | ||
| - Inform compensation and promotion decisions | ||
|
|
||
| Performance evaluation is based on observable behavior and documented impact. | ||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we add some frontmatter here?