Skip to content

Conversation

@gqcorneby
Copy link
Contributor

📌 References

📝 Implementation

  • update default selection for step 4: select all
  • add X.1 XOR X.2 check in step 3

📹 Screenshots/Screen capture

2025-09-29.19-48-20.mp4

🔥 Notes to the tester

@bundlemon
Copy link

bundlemon bot commented Sep 29, 2025

BundleMon

No change in files bundle size

Groups updated (1)
Status Path Size Limits
Build Folder
./**/*
1.24MB (+249B +0.02%) +20%

Final result: ✅

View report in BundleMon website ➡️


Current branch size history | Target branch size history

Copy link
Contributor

@Ramon-Jimenez Ramon-Jimenez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Working great, thanks @gqcorneby !

Waiting on @eperedo feedback before merging

Copy link
Contributor

@eperedo eperedo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, just a minor thing about a property possible not being used.

DataElementsLevelWithValues & {
result: string;
child: DataElementWithValue;
childPrefix: string;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure if I'm missing something, but we're not using the childPrefix attribute outside this function, right?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was originally using it for the warning message in case the dataElement wasn't found.
Something like this: Cannot get child (${childPrefix}) dataElement or dataValue for parent dataElement: ${de.id}-${de.name}

But I think this should be enough
Cannot get child dataElement or dataValue for parent dataElement: ${de.id}-${de.name}

I removed this unused attribute. Thank you, Eduardo!

@gqcorneby gqcorneby requested a review from eperedo October 2, 2025 09:55
@Ramon-Jimenez Ramon-Jimenez merged commit 2f5ba21 into development Oct 7, 2025
6 checks passed
@Ramon-Jimenez Ramon-Jimenez deleted the feature/add-GP-check branch October 7, 2025 07:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants