Skip to content

perf: remove unnecessary props from ReportActionContextMenu (isChronosReport, isPinnedChat, isUnreadChat, isThreadReportParentAction)#89683

Open
roryabraham wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
rory-contextmenu-remove-props
Open

perf: remove unnecessary props from ReportActionContextMenu (isChronosReport, isPinnedChat, isUnreadChat, isThreadReportParentAction)#89683
roryabraham wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
rory-contextmenu-remove-props

Conversation

@roryabraham
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@roryabraham roryabraham commented May 6, 2026

Explanation of Change

Removes 4 props that were unnecessarily threaded through the entire ReportActionContextMenu prop chain and derives them internally inside BaseReportActionContextMenu using Onyx data it already subscribes to. This also removes unnecessary state variables and setState calls which trigger additional re-renders in PopoverReportActionContextMenu.

This is an extraction from #83784.

Fixed Issues

(partial) #83774

Tests

  1. Right-click/long-press a chat message → context menu appears with correct actions (Reply in thread, Mark as unread, Copy message, Copy link, Flag as offensive)
  2. Hover over a chat message → mini context menu appears with emoji reactions + action buttons
  3. Right-click/long-press a chat in the LHN → REPORT-type context menu appears with Pin/Unpin and Mark as read/unread based on actual report state
  4. Open a thread, right-click the parent action at the top → "Leave thread" (not "Join thread") appears, confirming isThreadReportParentAction derivation is correct
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A — context menus are UI-only and don't make network requests.

QA Steps

Same as tests.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov
web.mov

roryabraham and others added 4 commits May 5, 2026 18:36
Remove the isChronosReport prop from BaseReportActionContextMenu,
PopoverReportActionContextMenu, and the showContextMenu() public API.
Derive it inside BaseReportActionContextMenu using the already-imported
chatIncludesChronosWithID(originalReportID) — the same call that was
already used in openOverflowMenu for the overflow submenu case.

Remove isChronos from openOverflowMenu's showContextMenu call since it
was always chatIncludesChronosWithID(originalReportID), identical to the
new derived value.

Remove isChronosReport from MiniReportActionContextMenu and the
showPopover call in PureReportActionItem.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Remove the isPinnedChat prop from BaseReportActionContextMenu,
PopoverReportActionContextMenu, and the showContextMenu() public API.
Derive it inside BaseReportActionContextMenu as !!report?.isPinned,
using the report object already subscribed to via useOnyx.

Remove isPinnedChat from OptionRowPressable's showContextMenu call.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Remove the isUnreadChat prop from BaseReportActionContextMenu,
PopoverReportActionContextMenu, and the showContextMenu() public API.
Derive it inside BaseReportActionContextMenu by comparing
report.lastReadTime against report.lastVisibleActionCreated, using
the report already subscribed to via useOnyx.

Remove isUnreadChat from OptionRowPressable's showContextMenu call.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Remove the isThreadReportParentAction prop from BaseReportActionContextMenu,
PopoverReportActionContextMenu, and the showContextMenu() public API.
Derive it inside BaseReportActionContextMenu by checking whether the
reportAction's childReportID matches the current reportID — this is true
exactly when we're viewing the parent action from within its thread report.

Remove isThreadReportParentAction from MiniReportActionContextMenu and
the showPopover call in PureReportActionItem. Remove it from
openOverflowMenu's showContextMenu call since the overflow context menu
will re-derive it internally from the same condition.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@roryabraham roryabraham requested a review from huult May 6, 2026 01:54
@roryabraham roryabraham marked this pull request as ready for review May 6, 2026 01:54
@roryabraham roryabraham requested review from a team as code owners May 6, 2026 01:54
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested review from flaviadefaria and removed request for a team May 6, 2026 01:55
@roryabraham
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@huult first of several PRs split off from the big one: #83784

@roryabraham roryabraham removed the request for review from flaviadefaria May 6, 2026 01:55
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested a review from deetergp May 6, 2026 01:55
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot Bot commented May 6, 2026

@deetergp Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot removed the request for review from a team May 6, 2026 01:55
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 6, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...c/components/LHNOptionsList/OptionRowPressable.tsx 85.00% <ø> (ø)
...report/ContextMenu/BaseReportActionContextMenu.tsx 84.66% <100.00%> (ø)
...nbox/report/ContextMenu/ReportActionContextMenu.ts 34.78% <ø> (ø)
src/pages/inbox/report/PureReportActionItem.tsx 80.37% <ø> (-0.06%) ⬇️
src/pages/inbox/report/ReportActionItem.tsx 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...ort/ContextMenu/PopoverReportActionContextMenu.tsx 44.19% <0.00%> (+0.36%) ⬆️
... and 8 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: f259145ba6

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

const isPinnedChat = !!report?.isPinned;
const isUnreadChat = !report?.lastReadTime || report.lastReadTime < (report.lastVisibleActionCreated ?? '');
// True when this action is the parent of a thread and we're viewing from within that thread
const isThreadReportParentAction = !!reportAction?.childReportID && String(reportAction.childReportID) === reportID;
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Preserve thread-parent context in ancestor menus

When the context menu is opened on the parent action shown at the top of a thread, ReportActionItemParentAction renders that row with report={ancestorReport} (the parent report) while the action's childReportID is the current thread report, so this comparison is false even though the row is explicitly a thread parent action. Before this change that boolean was passed through, but now the menu treats the thread header as a normal action, which can re-enable actions such as replying/opening the same thread and changes the join/leave thread options for that specific thread-header menu.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant