Skip to content

[Domain Control] [Release 4] [FE] Move single user between domain groups#88462

Merged
mountiny merged 10 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:feat/domain-members-move-single-user-between-groups
May 4, 2026
Merged

[Domain Control] [Release 4] [FE] Move single user between domain groups#88462
mountiny merged 10 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:feat/domain-members-move-single-user-between-groups

Conversation

@jmusial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jmusial jmusial commented Apr 21, 2026

Explanation of Change

This PR implements a page that allows admins to move a single domain member between security groups.

Fixed Issues

$ #88123
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  1. Open app
  2. Go to domain/domainID/members
  3. Click on member
  4. Click on Domain group menu item
  5. Select a group to move to
  6. Click Save
  7. Member should be moved

Offline tests

Same as tests

QA Steps

Same as tests

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2026-04-22.at.14.38.20.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2026-04-22.at.14.49.06.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2026-04-22.at.13.03.18.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-04-22.at.13.07.55.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-04-22.at.14.51.31.mov

@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot Bot commented Apr 21, 2026

Hey, I noticed you changed src/languages/en.ts in a PR from a fork. For security reasons, translations are not generated automatically for PRs from forks.

If you want to automatically generate translations for other locales, an Expensify employee will have to:

  1. Look at the code and make sure there are no malicious changes.
  2. Run the Generate static translations GitHub workflow. If you have write access and the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Alternatively, if you are an external contributor, you can run the translation script locally with your own OpenAI API key. To learn more, try running:

npx ts-node ./scripts/generateTranslations.ts --help

Typically, you'd want to translate only what you changed by running npx ts-node ./scripts/generateTranslations.ts --compare-ref main

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Apr 22, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/SCREENS.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...avigation/linkingConfig/RELATIONS/DOMAIN_TO_RHP.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/libs/Navigation/linkingConfig/config.ts 76.92% <ø> (ø)
src/selectors/Domain.ts 90.90% <100.00%> (ø)
src/ROUTES.ts 17.16% <0.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
...gation/AppNavigator/ModalStackNavigators/index.tsx 6.90% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
src/libs/actions/Domain.ts 53.45% <0.00%> (-0.75%) ⬇️
...c/pages/domain/Members/DomainMemberDetailsPage.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...pages/domain/Members/MoveUserBetweenGroupsPage.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 12 files with indirect coverage changes

@jmusial jmusial changed the title Change domain member group [Domain Control] [Release 4] [FE] Move single user between domain groups Apr 22, 2026
@jmusial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Apr 22, 2026

@codex review

@jmusial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Apr 22, 2026

@MelvinBot review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 09dbb22c54

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread src/pages/domain/Members/MoveUserBetweenGroupsPage.tsx Outdated
@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🦜 Polyglot Parrot! 🦜

Squawk! Looks like you added some shiny new English strings. Allow me to parrot them back to you in other tongues:

View the translation diff
diff --git a/src/languages/de.ts b/src/languages/de.ts
index 3e4fed08..c16f2a55 100644
--- a/src/languages/de.ts
+++ b/src/languages/de.ts
@@ -9103,6 +9103,8 @@ Hier ist ein *Testbeleg*, um dir zu zeigen, wie es funktioniert:`,
             emptyMembers: {title: 'Keine Mitglieder in dieser Gruppe', subtitle: 'Fügen Sie ein Mitglied hinzu oder versuchen Sie, den Filter oben zu ändern.'},
             moveToGroup: 'In Gruppe verschieben',
             chooseWhereToMove: ({count}: {count: number}) => `Wählen Sie aus, wohin Sie ${count} ${count === 1 ? 'Mitglied' : 'Mitglieder'} verschieben möchten.`,
+            domainGroup: 'Domain-Gruppe',
+            chooseWhereToMoveName: ({name}: {name: string}) => `Wähle aus, wohin ${name} verschoben werden soll.`,
         },
         common: {
             settings: 'Einstellungen',
diff --git a/src/languages/fr.ts b/src/languages/fr.ts
index ccfce7ca..6084acd9 100644
--- a/src/languages/fr.ts
+++ b/src/languages/fr.ts
@@ -9126,6 +9126,8 @@ Voici un *reçu test* pour vous montrer comment ça fonctionne :`,
             emptyMembers: {title: 'Aucun membre dans ce groupe', subtitle: 'Ajoutez un membre ou essayez de modifier le filtre ci-dessus.'},
             moveToGroup: 'Déplacer vers le groupe',
             chooseWhereToMove: ({count}: {count: number}) => `Choisissez où déplacer ${count} ${count === 1 ? 'membre' : 'membres'}.`,
+            domainGroup: 'Groupe de domaines',
+            chooseWhereToMoveName: ({name}: {name: string}) => `Choisissez où déplacer ${name}.`,
         },
         common: {
             settings: 'Paramètres',
diff --git a/src/languages/it.ts b/src/languages/it.ts
index 6903a219..c1aa89e5 100644
--- a/src/languages/it.ts
+++ b/src/languages/it.ts
@@ -9093,6 +9093,8 @@ Ecco una *ricevuta di prova* per mostrarti come funziona:`,
             emptyMembers: {title: 'Nessun membro in questo gruppo', subtitle: 'Aggiungi un membro o prova a cambiare il filtro qui sopra.'},
             moveToGroup: 'Sposta nel gruppo',
             chooseWhereToMove: ({count}: {count: number}) => `Scegli dove spostare ${count} ${count === 1 ? 'membro' : 'membri'}.`,
+            domainGroup: 'Gruppo di domini',
+            chooseWhereToMoveName: ({name}: {name: string}) => `Scegli dove spostare ${name}.`,
         },
         common: {
             settings: 'Impostazioni',
diff --git a/src/languages/ja.ts b/src/languages/ja.ts
index 02ed4423..459230d3 100644
--- a/src/languages/ja.ts
+++ b/src/languages/ja.ts
@@ -8979,6 +8979,8 @@ ${reportName}
             emptyMembers: {title: 'このグループにはメンバーがいません', subtitle: 'メンバーを追加するか、上のフィルターを変更してみてください。'},
             moveToGroup: 'グループへ移動',
             chooseWhereToMove: ({count}: {count: number}) => `${count} ${count === 1 ? 'メンバー' : 'メンバー'} を移動する先を選択してください。`,
+            domainGroup: 'ドメイングループ',
+            chooseWhereToMoveName: ({name}: {name: string}) => `${name} をどこに移動するか選択してください。`,
         },
         common: {
             settings: '設定',
diff --git a/src/languages/nl.ts b/src/languages/nl.ts
index a5c8c89a..ff9be702 100644
--- a/src/languages/nl.ts
+++ b/src/languages/nl.ts
@@ -9066,6 +9066,8 @@ Hier is een *proefbon* om je te laten zien hoe het werkt:`,
             emptyMembers: {title: 'Geen leden in deze groep', subtitle: 'Voeg een lid toe of probeer het filter hierboven te wijzigen.'},
             moveToGroup: 'Verplaatsen naar groep',
             chooseWhereToMove: ({count}: {count: number}) => `Kies waar je ${count} ${count === 1 ? 'lid' : 'leden'} naartoe wilt verplaatsen.`,
+            domainGroup: 'Domeingroep',
+            chooseWhereToMoveName: ({name}: {name: string}) => `Kies waar je ${name} naartoe wilt verplaatsen.`,
         },
         common: {
             settings: 'Instellingen',
diff --git a/src/languages/pl.ts b/src/languages/pl.ts
index 1e3d9a11..087991eb 100644
--- a/src/languages/pl.ts
+++ b/src/languages/pl.ts
@@ -9047,6 +9047,8 @@ Oto *paragon testowy*, żeby pokazać Ci, jak to działa:`,
             emptyMembers: {title: 'Brak członków w tej grupie', subtitle: 'Dodaj członka lub spróbuj zmienić filtr powyżej.'},
             moveToGroup: 'Przenieś do grupy',
             chooseWhereToMove: ({count}: {count: number}) => `Wybierz, dokąd przenieść ${count} ${count === 1 ? 'członka' : 'członków'}.`,
+            domainGroup: 'Grupa domen',
+            chooseWhereToMoveName: ({name}: {name: string}) => `Wybierz, dokąd przenieść ${name}.`,
         },
         common: {
             settings: 'Ustawienia',
diff --git a/src/languages/pt-BR.ts b/src/languages/pt-BR.ts
index 30f83244..20116f9a 100644
--- a/src/languages/pt-BR.ts
+++ b/src/languages/pt-BR.ts
@@ -9055,6 +9055,8 @@ Aqui está um *comprovante de teste* para mostrar como funciona:`,
             emptyMembers: {title: 'Nenhum membro neste grupo', subtitle: 'Adicione um membro ou tente mudar o filtro acima.'},
             moveToGroup: 'Mover para grupo',
             chooseWhereToMove: ({count}: {count: number}) => `Escolha para onde mover ${count} ${count === 1 ? 'membro' : 'membros'}.`,
+            domainGroup: 'Grupo de domínio',
+            chooseWhereToMoveName: ({name}: {name: string}) => `Escolha para onde mover ${name}.`,
         },
         common: {
             settings: 'Configurações',
diff --git a/src/languages/zh-hans.ts b/src/languages/zh-hans.ts
index 1ecfc9a6..c16fba9a 100644
--- a/src/languages/zh-hans.ts
+++ b/src/languages/zh-hans.ts
@@ -8828,6 +8828,8 @@ ${reportName}
             emptyMembers: {title: '此群组中没有成员', subtitle: '添加成员或尝试更改上方的筛选条件。'},
             moveToGroup: '移至群组',
             chooseWhereToMove: ({count}: {count: number}) => `选择将 ${count} 个 ${count === 1 ? '成员' : '成员'} 移动到哪里。`,
+            domainGroup: '域名组',
+            chooseWhereToMoveName: ({name}: {name: string}) => `选择将 ${name} 移动到哪里。`,
         },
         common: {
             settings: '设置',

Note

You can apply these changes to your branch by copying the patch to your clipboard, then running pbpaste | git apply 😉

View workflow run

@jmusial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Apr 23, 2026

Test fail unrelated

@jmusial jmusial marked this pull request as ready for review April 23, 2026 10:46
@jmusial jmusial requested review from a team as code owners April 23, 2026 10:46
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested review from JmillsExpensify and situchan and removed request for a team April 23, 2026 10:46
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot Bot commented Apr 23, 2026

@situchan Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot removed the request for review from a team April 23, 2026 10:46
@jmusial jmusial moved this to Ready for Review in Bring Domain Control to NewDot Apr 23, 2026
const [userSecurityGroup] = useOnyx(`${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.DOMAIN}${domainAccountID}`, {
selector: securityGroupSelector,
});
const memberLogin = getLoginByAccountID(accountID);
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ PERF-11 (docs)

The securityGroupSelector is defined as an inline arrow function in the component body and passed as the selector option to useOnyx. This creates a new function reference on every render, which defeats Onyx's selector stability check and forces unnecessary re-evaluation and deep equality comparisons on every render cycle.

The existing DomainMemberDetailsPage.tsx correctly handles the same pattern by wrapping the selector in useCallback:

// Current (unstable - new reference every render):
const securityGroupSelector = (domain: OnyxEntry<Domain>) => selectSecurityGroupForAccount(accountID)(domain);

// Fix (stable reference, consistent with DomainMemberDetailsPage.tsx line 47):
const securityGroupSelector = useCallback((domain: OnyxEntry<Domain>) => selectSecurityGroupForAccount(accountID)(domain), [accountID]);

Reviewed at: 21925c4 | Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

react compiler should take care of this

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 21925c438b

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread src/pages/domain/Members/MoveUserBetweenGroupsPage.tsx Outdated
@jmusial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Apr 27, 2026

@situchan kind bump here

@situchan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

situchan commented Apr 27, 2026

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
Screen.Recording.2026-04-27.at.11.07.17.PM.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-04-27.at.11.04.14.PM.mov

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Overall this PR looks clean — well-structured, good test coverage for the selector fix, all CI checks pass, and it follows existing patterns closely. One issue to flag:

Selector not memoized in MoveUserBetweenGroupsPage

In MoveUserBetweenGroupsPage.tsx:44-45, the securityGroupSelector is created inline without useCallback:

const securityGroupSelector = (domain: OnyxEntry<Domain>) => selectSecurityGroupForAccount(accountID)(domain);

This recreates the selector function on every render, which can cause unnecessary Onyx re-subscriptions. DomainMemberDetailsPage.tsx:55 already handles this correctly with useCallback:

const securityGroupSelector = useCallback((domain: OnyxEntry<Domain>) => selectSecurityGroupForAccount(accountID)(domain), [accountID]);

The same pattern should be used here for consistency and to avoid potential performance issues.


type MoveUserBetweenGroupsPageProps = PlatformStackScreenProps<SettingsNavigatorParamList, typeof SCREENS.DOMAIN.MEMBER_MOVE_TO_GROUP>;

function MoveUserBetweenGroupsPage({route}: MoveUserBetweenGroupsPageProps) {
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This component is pretty much overlapped with MoveUsersBetweenGroupsPage.
@MelvinBot is it possible to share common logic to avoid code duplication?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, there's meaningful overlap. The shared parts are: the SecurityGroupItem type, the securityGroups to list items mapping, handleSelectRow, and the entire JSX skeleton (wrapper, header, subtitle, selection list, footer button).

The differences are in data sourcing and save behavior:

Single-user page: gets accountID from route params, pre-selects current group, single changeDomainSecurityGroup call, navigates back to member details, checks selectedGroupId === currentGroupId and memberLogin for disabled state.

Bulk page: gets selectedMemberAccountIDs from Onyx, no pre-selection, loops changeDomainSecurityGroup for each member, navigates back to members list, only checks selectedGroupId for disabled state.

One approach: extract a shared SelectSecurityGroupPage component that accepts props for the subtitle, onSave callback, isDisabled, onBack, and initiallySelectedGroupId, and renders the common shell. Each page becomes a thin wrapper that supplies its specific data and save logic. This keeps the UI DRY without forcing a premature abstraction over the behavioral differences.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we try this? Btw not blocker.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jakubstec Yeah maybe something for a follow up but I agree this is not a blocker

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Nice work!

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested a review from mountiny April 27, 2026 17:39
@jmusial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Apr 29, 2026

I'll be OOO until 10 May. @jakubstec will be looking after this PR until then.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB comments to be addressed in some future follow up


type MoveUserBetweenGroupsPageProps = PlatformStackScreenProps<SettingsNavigatorParamList, typeof SCREENS.DOMAIN.MEMBER_MOVE_TO_GROUP>;

function MoveUserBetweenGroupsPage({route}: MoveUserBetweenGroupsPageProps) {
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jakubstec Yeah maybe something for a follow up but I agree this is not a blocker

import type {Domain} from '@src/types/onyx';

type SecurityGroupItem = ListItem & {
value: string;
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

docs

@mountiny mountiny merged commit 196660f into Expensify:main May 4, 2026
36 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from Ready for Review to Done in Bring Domain Control to NewDot May 4, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 4, 2026

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OSBotify commented May 5, 2026

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.3.67-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Yes, help site changes are needed. The PR adds a new user-facing flow for Domain Admins to move a single member between domain groups from the member details page, which isn't documented in the current Manage Domain Members article.

I've created a draft PR with the update: #89644

Changes made:

  • Added a new "How to move a Domain Member to a different domain group" section with step-by-step instructions
  • Updated article metadata (internalScope and keywords) to reflect the new coverage

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants