Conversation
Espeer5
added
the
Feedback PR
Espeer5
changed the title
| analogy~\cite{Hertweck_2024}, analytically showing that the extent to which | ||
| algorithmic fairness measures can be seen as a form of distributive justice | ||
| is quite limited, and isolated to egalitarian concepts of | ||
| justice~\cite{Kuppler_2021}. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The preceding paragraph needs to be clearer: It is not obvious to me why measures of algorithmic fairness are an instantiation of distributive justice. In what sense is something redistributed? It would be useful to spell out this connection between distributive justice and algorithmic fairness. I always thought of, say, Rawls's theory as one account of fairness and that e.g. "fairness through unawareness" could be one fairness criterion for algorithms that is motivated by Rawls's theory. But it is less clear to me that there is a broader connection.
|
|
||
| In this paper, we propose a new direction for research that incorporates a | ||
| previously overlooked distributive justice concept: entitlement justice. | ||
| Entitlement theory, which roots justice in the idea of respecting individuals' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ok, so there is a terminological issue here -- what exactly is encompassed by the concept of distributive justice?
2 participants
This PR provides a feedback space for 2 elements of the paper:
To see the content in these sections, click the "Files changed" tab. You can then comment on these sections line by line.