Merged
Conversation
jpe442
reviewed
Feb 5, 2026
Contributor
jpe442
left a comment
jpe442
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@tswartz-edb Does this only apply to IR version? Does it need to be backported to the LTS docs?
Contributor
Author
|
Checking, it looks like it also will need to be back-patched to the LTS docs, yes. |
Fix incorrect command to delete secret
jpe442
force-pushed
the
tswartz-edb-patch-1
branch
from
dd64cf4 to
45d4dc5
Compare
josh-heyer
approved these changes
Feb 6, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What Changed?
Fix incorrect command to delete secret