fix: invalidate railpack build cache when env changes#4557
Draft
rnkp755 wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What is this PR about?
Fix Railpack application rebuilds so environment variable changes are reflected without requiring Clean Cache or Docker cache pruning.
Railpack builds pass application env vars as BuildKit secrets, but BuildKit secrets do not reliably invalidate cached layers by themselves. Previously, Dokploy only passed the
secrets-hashbuild arg whencleanCachewas enabled, so regular rebuilds could reuse stale cached output after env vars changed.This PR always passes a hash of the resolved environment variables to the Railpack Docker build. The normal build cache is still used when env vars do not change, while env changes now invalidate the relevant cached build output.
Checklist
Before submitting this PR, please make sure that:
canarybranch.Issues related (if applicable)
closes #4516