fix(obfuscate): stop obfuscating postgres EXTRACT temporal field#50307
fix(obfuscate): stop obfuscating postgres EXTRACT temporal field#50307Eldolfin wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…c temporal field Fixes #49420 and DataDog/integrations-core#23565
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Files inventory check summaryFile checks results against ancestor 76de2fb1: Results for datadog-agent_7.80.0~devel.git.450.6b84c9a.pipeline.111257595-1_amd64.deb:No change detected |
Static quality checks✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates Successful checksInfo
28 successful checks with minimal change (< 2 KiB)
On-wire sizes (compressed)
|
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: d7f52b1 Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | docker_containers_cpu | % cpu utilization | +0.31 | [-2.61, +3.23] | 1 | Logs |
Fine details of change detection per experiment
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | +1.42 | [+0.44, +2.39] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_metrics | memory utilization | +0.54 | [+0.39, +0.70] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | +0.52 | [+0.48, +0.56] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics | memory utilization | +0.35 | [+0.15, +0.56] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | docker_containers_cpu | % cpu utilization | +0.31 | [-2.61, +3.23] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics_sum_delta | memory utilization | +0.27 | [+0.08, +0.45] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | +0.22 | [+0.17, +0.27] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics_sum_cumulativetodelta_exporter | memory utilization | +0.20 | [-0.04, +0.43] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | memory utilization | +0.09 | [-0.16, +0.34] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders | memory utilization | +0.08 | [+0.03, +0.13] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +0.07 | [+0.01, +0.12] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.06 | [-0.05, +0.17] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_logs | memory utilization | +0.04 | [-0.03, +0.10] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_logs | memory utilization | +0.02 | [-0.08, +0.13] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_v3 | ingress throughput | +0.02 | [-0.18, +0.21] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.39, +0.40] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.09, +0.10] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.20, +0.19] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.45, +0.43] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.06 | [-0.59, +0.48] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | docker_containers_memory | memory utilization | -0.10 | [-0.20, -0.00] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics_sum_cumulative | memory utilization | -0.76 | [-0.92, -0.60] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.94 | [-1.10, -0.78] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed
| perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | observed_value | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ | docker_containers_cpu | simple_check_run | 10/10 | 714 ≥ 26 | |
| ✅ | docker_containers_memory | memory_usage | 10/10 | 242.97MiB ≤ 370MiB | |
| ✅ | docker_containers_memory | simple_check_run | 10/10 | 715 ≥ 26 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | 0.16GiB ≤ 1.20GiB | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | missed_bytes | 10/10 | 0B = 0B | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | 0.20GiB ≤ 1.20GiB | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | missed_bytes | 10/10 | 0B = 0B | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | 0.17GiB ≤ 1.20GiB | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | missed_bytes | 10/10 | 0B = 0B | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | 0.19GiB ≤ 1.20GiB | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | missed_bytes | 10/10 | 0B = 0B | |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | intake_connections | 10/10 | 3 ≤ 4 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | 143.15MiB ≤ 147MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | intake_connections | 10/10 | 3 ≤ 4 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | 469.00MiB ≤ 495MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | 3 ≤ 6 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 | 177.35MiB ≤ 195MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | missed_bytes | 10/10 | 0B = 0B | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | cpu_usage | 10/10 | 353.67 ≤ 2000 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | 3 ≤ 6 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 | 367.37MiB ≤ 430MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | missed_bytes | 10/10 | 0B = 0B | bounds checks dashboard |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
Fixes #49420 and DataDog/integrations-core#23565
What does this PR do?
In a query like
SELECT EXTRACT(epoch FROM t.ts) FROM t;keepepoch(the temporal field) as is instead of obfuscating it.Motivation
Describe how you validated your changes
Additional Notes
TODO
depends on DataDog/go-sqllexer#97