Skip to content

Conversation

@DashCoreAutoGuix
Copy link
Owner

Backports bitcoin#23927

This PR prevents getblockfrompeer from getting used on blocks that the node has not synced past yet if the node is running in prune mode.

Changes:

  • Added check in getblockfrompeer RPC to reject requests for blocks above the current chain tip when in prune mode
  • Added functional test for this behavior

Conflict resolution:

  • Resolved import conflicts in test/functional/rpc_getblockfrompeer.py - added required imports (CBlock, from_hex, msg_headers, P2PInterface) without NODE_WITNESS which doesn't exist in Dash (SegWit not supported)

Original Bitcoin commit: 88502ec

…yncing past their height

5826bf5 test: Add test for getblockfrompeer on syncing pruned nodes (Fabian Jahr)
7fa851f rpc: Pruned nodes can not fetch unsynced blocks (Fabian Jahr)

Pull request description:

  This PR prevents `getblockfrompeer` from getting used on blocks that the node has not synced past yet if the node is in running in prune mode.

  ### Problem

  While a node is still catching up to the tip that it is aware of via the headers, the user can currently use  to fetch blocks close to or at the tip. These blocks are stored in the block/rev file that otherwise contains blocks the node is receiving as part of the syncing process.

  This creates a problem for pruned nodes: The files containing a fetched block are not pruned during syncing because they contain a block close to the tip. This means the entire file (~130MB) will not be pruned until the tip has moved on far enough from the fetched block. In extreme cases with heavy pruning (like 550) and multiple blocks being fetched this could mean that the disc usage far exceeds what the user expects, potentially running out of space.

  ### Approach

  There would be certainly other approaches that could fix the problem while still allowing the current behavior, but all of the ideas I came up with seemed like overkill for a niche problem on a new RPC where it's still unclear how and how much it will be used.

  ### Testing

  So far I did not see a simple enough way to test this I am still looking into it and if it's complex will potentially add it in a follow-up. What would be needed is a way to have a node fetch headers but not sync the blocks yet, that seems like a pattern that could be generally useful.

  To manually reproduce the problematic behavior:
  1. Start a node with current `master` with `-prune=550` and an empty/new datadir, Testnet and Mainnet should both work.
  2. While the node is syncing run `getblockfrompeer` on the current tip and a few other recent blocks.
  3. Go to your datadir and observe the blocks folder: There should be a few full `blk*.dat` and `rev*.dat` files that are not being pruned. When you "pinned" a few of these files the blocks folder should be significantly above the target size of 550MB.

ACKs for top commit:
  Sjors:
    utACK 5826bf5
  achow101:
    ACK 5826bf5
  aureleoules:
    tACK 5826bf5

Tree-SHA512: aa3f477ec755a9df2331c047cb10b3cd08292522bf6ad7a36a7ea36d7eba4894b84de8bd23003c9baea5ac0c53b77142c3c2819ae7528cece9d10a0d06c850d8
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 6, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@DashCoreAutoGuix has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 40 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9cf919c and 2831966.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/rpc/blockchain.cpp (1 hunks)
  • test/functional/rpc_getblockfrompeer.py (2 hunks)
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch backport-0.25-batch-480-pr-23927

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants