Fix RedstoneInteractionBlock automatic placement #799
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Additionally, Block Placers now place blocks relative to the direction they themselves are placed in, as opposed to a static one.
Look direction is opposite to the block placer, as by convention and by implementation in Spectrum, directional blocks face towards the player. This would make the use of a Block Placer moot for things such as dispensers, furnaces, or pistons, as they would always face towards the block that placed them, leaving the face covered.
This technically now also allows for block breakers to be placed further inwards to a tree, allowing for, given some advanced and convoluted redstone, all leaves of a small tree to be broken by a player-simulating block breaker using only Spectrum.