Skip to content

Use content built from Konflux instead of ghcr#1019

Closed
rhmdnd wants to merge 1 commit intoComplianceAsCode:masterfrom
rhmdnd:use-content-image-built-from-konflux
Closed

Use content built from Konflux instead of ghcr#1019
rhmdnd wants to merge 1 commit intoComplianceAsCode:masterfrom
rhmdnd:use-content-image-built-from-konflux

Conversation

@rhmdnd
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@rhmdnd rhmdnd commented Dec 4, 2025

We're already using Konflux to build the content, so let's update the
e2e testing to also use that content instead of referencing the old
k8scontent github action.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Dec 4, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rhmdnd

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved label Dec 4, 2025
We're already using Konflux to build the content, so let's update the
e2e testing to also use that content instead of referencing the old
k8scontent github action.
@rhmdnd rhmdnd force-pushed the use-content-image-built-from-konflux branch from 4b59ee7 to ba7331c Compare December 4, 2025 22:42
@rhmdnd rhmdnd requested a review from yuumasato December 4, 2025 22:43
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Dec 4, 2025

🤖 To deploy this PR, run the following command:

make catalog-deploy CATALOG_IMG=ghcr.io/complianceascode/compliance-operator-catalog:1019-4b59ee7623c4799b2f25b686662a19a4f189faca

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Dec 4, 2025

🤖 To deploy this PR, run the following command:

make catalog-deploy CATALOG_IMG=ghcr.io/complianceascode/compliance-operator-catalog:1019-ba7331cbc21fc0ba0743c39d9a7eb3c24c00a3f4

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@yuumasato yuumasato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure if it will help with the current failures on:

 === NAME  TestNonExistentDeprecatedProfile
    main_test.go:786: expected error message to be from failed profile deprecation check
--- FAIL: TestNonExistentDeprecatedProfile (25.04s) 

But I think images/testcontent/Dockerfile.ci needs to be updated as well, as it uses the testcontent as CONTENT_IMAGE_FROM_CI:
https://github.com/openshift/release/blob/master/ci-operator/config/ComplianceAsCode/compliance-operator/ComplianceAsCode-compliance-operator-master.yaml#L35

@yuumasato
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/retest

2 similar comments
@xiaojiey
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/retest

@yuumasato
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/retest

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Jan 8, 2026

@rhmdnd: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-parallel ba7331c link true /test e2e-aws-parallel
ci/prow/e2e-aws-parallel-arm ba7331c link true /test e2e-aws-parallel-arm

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@rhmdnd
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

rhmdnd commented Mar 25, 2026

I need to fix my fork network for some other things I'm working on, and as a result I'm going to close this and re-open it once I have those things cleaned up.

@rhmdnd rhmdnd closed this Mar 25, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants