Conversation
|
The preview deployment for Canada Spends is ready. 🟢 Open Preview | Open Build Logs Last updated at: 2025-11-27 19:49:21 CET |
🚨 Preview Deployment Blocked - Security ProtectionYour pull request was blocked from triggering preview deployments Why was this blocked?
How to resolve this:Option 1: Get Collaborator Access (Recommended) Option 2: Request Permission Override For Repository Administrators:To disable this security check ( This security measure protects against malicious code execution in preview deployments. Only trusted collaborators should have the ability to trigger deployments. 🛡️ Learn more about this security featureThis protection prevents unauthorized users from:
Preview deployments are powerful but require trust. Only users with repository write access can trigger them. |
…a bit more granular details to the spend
|
Hey, thanks for putting this together @thalasith ! Some feedback:
Also tagged Brendan for an eng review. |
|
@melkuo sounds good! I'll delete a layer for it along with any changes Brendan says from engineering perspective in the final commit to this branch. For your questions: 1. What is "controlled organizations" vs "municipal administration less eliminations"_Boris: Schedule 2 breaks down the revenue / expenses into these categories. Eliminations is always a negative amount (so it would mess up the visualizations. My understanding of elimination is that it's an accounting term to adjust any intercompany transactions - so it was best to subtract that with the municipal administration (at least IMO). I don't live in Montreal (unfortunately :)) but I understand "controlled organizations" would be like other government organizations that is outside of the ville of Montreal's "control" - e.g. maybe the company that is responsible for the trains._ 2. On a related note, any luck finding any breakouts of wages vs operating costs?_Boris: Yes, I found some stuff... but it looked quite "sus" to me. Happy to include it (but would want to chat with you + maybe an accountant on this). The total value of the table below adds up to CAD 8,714,225 (at the bottom) and 🟩includes🟩 things like "Amortization of tangible capital assets", "Write-offs of TCA's", and "other objects". However, the statement of operations shows that the total expenditures is also CAD 8,714,225 and it 🟥excludes🟥 things like "Amortization of tangible capital assets", "Write-offs of TCA's", and "other objects". So this looks off to me - and potentially an accounting error? But would want to make sure I am not being an idiot before we start saying these things 😄_
|
|
For the nesting, I would create two categories, one for |


Adding in Montreal's data. WIll need a quick PR 😄.
Similar to Vancouver, I added in the tangible capital assets / non tangible capital assets.
The "deficit" is actually the "Change in Net Debt" on page 26 of the report (-888,047).
Here is the raw file:
https://mtl.ged.montreal.ca/constellio/?collection=mtlca&portal=REPDOCVDM#!displayDocument/00000120414