chore(deps): update dependency com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jdk8 to v2.21.2

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Adoption	Passing	Confidence
com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jdk8	2.18.2 → 2.21.2
com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jdk8	2.13.4 → 2.21.2

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

• Branch creation
  • At any time (no schedule defined)
• Automerge
  • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
boomchainlab-framework	Error		Mar 20, 2026 6:09pm

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[graphite-app]

The version update for jackson-datatype-jdk8 to 2.19.2 in the resolutionStrategy block creates inconsistency with other Jackson dependencies that remain at 2.13.4. According to the comment above this block, the purpose is to "compile and test against a lower Jackson version to ensure we're compatible with it." To maintain this compatibility testing approach, this dependency should remain at version 2.13.4 like the other Jackson components in this block.

The implementation dependency can be updated to 2.19.2 as shown later in the file, but the forced resolution version should stay consistent with the compatibility testing strategy.

Suggested change

	force("com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jdk8:2.19.2")
	force("com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jdk8:2.13.4")

Spotted by Diamond

Is this helpful? React 👍 or 👎 to let us know.

[graphite-app]

This PR introduces a version inconsistency in the Jackson library ecosystem. The jackson-datatype-jdk8 component is being updated to version 2.20.0 while other Jackson components remain at 2.13.4 in the force configuration block.

Jackson libraries are designed to work together as a cohesive unit, and mixing versions can lead to compatibility issues or unexpected behavior. For optimal stability, all Jackson components should use the same version.

Consider either:

1. Updating all Jackson dependencies to 2.20.0, or
2. Maintaining the current version (2.13.4) for all Jackson components

This applies to both the force() configuration and the implementation dependencies below.

Suggested change

	force("com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core:2.13.4")
	force("com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind:2.13.4")
	force("com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-annotations:2.13.4")
	force("com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jdk8:2.13.4")
	force("com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jdk8:2.20.0")
	force("com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jsr310:2.13.4")
	force("com.fasterxml.jackson.module:jackson-module-kotlin:2.13.4")
	force("com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core:2.13.4")
	force("com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind:2.13.4")
	force("com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-annotations:2.13.4")
	force("com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jdk8:2.13.4")
	force("com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jsr310:2.13.4")
	force("com.fasterxml.jackson.module:jackson-module-kotlin:2.13.4")

Spotted by Diamond



Is this helpful? React 👍 or 👎 to let us know.