feat: complete bug fix milestone with API, security, and DRY improvements by Jarvis-AojDevStuio · Pull Request #35 · AojdevStudio/gdrive

Jarvis-AojDevStuio · 2026-02-04T05:22:17Z

Summary

Comprehensive bug fix milestone delivering improvements across 4 phases with 43 commits, covering API consistency, security hardening, DRY extraction, and validation planning.

Phase 1: API Consistency

Renamed Gmail modifyLabels parameter from messageId to id for consistency
Updated Calendar module to use eventId instead of id with new DeleteEventResult type
Added unit tests for both Gmail labels and Calendar delete operations

Phase 2: Security Fixes

Added query escaping for Google Drive search to prevent injection attacks
Created Gmail utils.ts with shared validation functions (email validation, input sanitization)
Updated compose.ts and send.ts to use centralized security validation
Added comprehensive security tests for Drive search and Gmail compose/utils

Phase 3: DRY Extraction

Extracted parseAttendees and buildEventResult utilities into calendar/utils.ts
Refactored create.ts, read.ts, and update.ts to use shared calendar utilities
Completed UAT with 5/5 tests passing
Added comprehensive unit tests for all calendar utility functions

Phase 4: Validation (Planning)

Captured phase context and research for input validation improvements
Created plans for validation implementation (04-01 and 04-02)

Tooling & Infrastructure

Replaced bmad/serena tooling with GSD (Get Shit Done) framework
Added GSD agents, commands, workflows, templates, and references
Removed legacy .serena/ and .beads/ directories
Condensed and updated CLAUDE.md project documentation
Added comprehensive .planning/ directory with codebase analysis and phase documentation

Type of Change

Feature
Bug Fix
Refactoring
Documentation

Test Plan

Run npm run build to verify TypeScript compilation succeeds
Run npm test to verify all unit tests pass (including new tests for calendar utils, Drive search security, Gmail compose/utils, Gmail labels, and Calendar delete)
Verify calendar operations use eventId parameter consistently
Verify Gmail modifyLabels uses id parameter
Verify Drive search queries are properly escaped
Verify Gmail compose validates email addresses and sanitizes inputs

Files Changed

174 files changed (+43,411 insertions, -2,671 deletions)
Key source changes in src/modules/calendar/, src/modules/gmail/, src/modules/drive/, src/tools/
New test files: utils.test.ts, delete.test.ts, search.test.ts, compose.test.ts, labels.test.ts
New utility modules: calendar/utils.ts, gmail/utils.ts
Full .planning/ phase documentation and .claude/ GSD framework

Checklist

Tests passing locally
No merge conflicts with target branch
Documentation updated
Code reviewed by team member

Co-Authored-By: AOJDevStudio

- STACK.md - Technologies and dependencies - ARCHITECTURE.md - System design and patterns - STRUCTURE.md - Directory layout - CONVENTIONS.md - Code style and patterns - TESTING.md - Test structure - INTEGRATIONS.md - External services - CONCERNS.md - Technical debt and issues

- PROJECT.md - 28 issues across Gmail, Calendar, Drive, Forms modules - REQUIREMENTS.md - 19 traceable requirements (API, SEC, DRY, VAL, CACHE, CLEAN, DOC) - ROADMAP.md - 6 phases from API consistency to cleanup - STATE.md - Project state tracking - config.json - GSD workflow configuration Scope: All HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW issues from specs/bugs.md Approach: Clean break for API renames, tests + manual verification Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Phase 01: API Consistency - Standard stack identified (TypeScript 5.6.2, Jest 29.7.0, ts-jest 29.1.2) - Architecture patterns documented (type-first refactoring, mock context testing) - Pitfalls catalogued (incomplete propagation, tool docs, test mismatches) - Code examples provided for parameter renames and unit tests Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Phase 01: API Consistency - 2 plan(s) in 1 wave(s) - 2 parallel, 0 sequential - Ready for execution Plans: - 01-01: Gmail modifyLabels id parameter rename (API-01) - 01-02: Calendar EventResult eventId + deleteEvent type fix (API-02, API-03) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

- Changed EventResult.id to EventResult.eventId for consistency with input parameters - DeleteEventResult already correctly uses eventId field - EventSummary remains unchanged (intentional for list operations) - This change will be propagated to implementations in next commit

…eEventResult - read.ts: getEvent returns EventResult with eventId field - create.ts: createEvent and quickAdd return EventResult with eventId field - update.ts: updateEvent returns EventResult with eventId field - delete.ts: deleteEvent returns DeleteEventResult with eventId (removed success field) - All cache invalidation and logging updated to use eventId - Build passes with no TypeScript errors

- Update ModifyLabelsOptions.messageId to id - Update ModifyLabelsResult.messageId to id - Update modifyLabels implementation to use id throughout - Update JSDoc examples to use id parameter - Aligns with getMessage/getThread consistent id naming

- Add 8 comprehensive tests covering all modifyLabels scenarios - Test id parameter usage (not messageId) - Test result includes id field - Test cache invalidation with correct message id - Test logging with id parameter - Test performance tracking - Test add labels only, remove labels only, and both operations - All tests pass

- Created delete.test.ts with 11 comprehensive tests for deleteEvent - Tests verify DeleteEventResult return type with eventId and message - Tests verify no success field in result - Updated read.test.ts to check eventId instead of id in results - Updated cached result fixtures to use eventId field - All 70 calendar tests pass

- Change signature from messageId to id - Update example to use id parameter - Ensures AI agents see consistent parameter naming

Tasks completed: 3/3 - Task 1: Update Calendar types - EventResult and DeleteEventResult - Task 2: Update Calendar implementations - read, create, update, delete - Task 3: Create/update tests and documentation SUMMARY: .planning/phases/01-api-consistency/01-02-SUMMARY.md

Tasks completed: 3/3 - Renamed ModifyLabelsOptions/Result.messageId to id - Created 8 unit tests for modifyLabels - Updated tool documentation SUMMARY: .planning/phases/01-api-consistency/01-01-SUMMARY.md

- REQUIREMENTS.md: Mark API-01, API-02, API-03 as Complete - ROADMAP.md: Check off both plans (01-01, 01-02) as done - VERIFICATION.md: Add phase goal verification report (6/6 passed) Phase 1 achieved: Standardized parameter naming across Gmail and Calendar - Gmail: modifyLabels uses `id` parameter consistently - Calendar: EventResult returns `eventId` matching input - Calendar: deleteEvent returns DeleteEventResult with eventId Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Phase 2: Security Fixes - Standard stack identified (Node.js built-ins, Jest testing) - Architecture patterns documented (query escaping, shared validation) - Pitfalls catalogued (incomplete escaping, validation bypass, over-escaping) - Code examples from official Google docs and existing codebase

Phase 02: Security Fixes - 2 plan(s) in 1 wave(s) - 2 parallel plans (both Wave 1) - Ready for execution Plans: - 02-01: Drive search query escaping (SEC-01) - 02-02: Gmail shared validation utilities (SEC-02) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

- Add escapeQueryValue helper function with JSDoc - Escape single quotes in search query parameter - Escape single quotes in enhancedSearch query parameter - Escape single quotes in mimeType filter - Escape single quotes in parents filter - Prevents query injection via user input

- Extract sanitizeHeaderValue for CRLF injection prevention - Extract isValidEmailAddress for RFC 5322 validation - Extract encodeSubject for RFC 2047 non-ASCII encoding - Extract validateAndSanitizeRecipients for consistent validation - Extract encodeToBase64Url for Gmail API encoding - All functions have JSDoc comments and proper TypeScript types

- Add imports for validation functions from utils.js - Remove local function definitions (duplicates) - Use encodeToBase64Url helper for message encoding - buildEmailMessage stays in send.ts (Bcc handling differs from drafts) - All existing Gmail tests pass

- Create security test suite for query escaping - Test single quote escaping in search queries - Test multiple single quotes handling - Test query injection prevention - Test enhancedSearch query and filter escaping - Test combined query and filter escaping - 9 security tests covering all injection scenarios

- Import validation functions from utils.js - Validate email addresses in to, cc, bcc, from fields - Sanitize headers to prevent CRLF injection - Encode non-ASCII subjects with RFC 2047 - Use encodeToBase64Url helper for message encoding - Add security measures JSDoc comment to buildEmailMessage

Tasks completed: 2/2 - Add escapeQueryValue function and update search functions - Create Drive search security tests SUMMARY: .planning/phases/02-security-fixes/02-01-SUMMARY.md

utils.test.ts (26 tests): - sanitizeHeaderValue removes CR/LF characters - isValidEmailAddress validates RFC 5322 patterns - encodeSubject handles ASCII and non-ASCII subjects - validateAndSanitizeRecipients validates and sanitizes - encodeToBase64Url creates base64url encoding compose.test.ts (7 tests): - Validates email addresses in to, cc, bcc, from fields - Sanitizes CRLF in subject to prevent header injection - Creates drafts with valid inputs - Handles multiple valid recipients All 33 tests pass

Tasks completed: 4/4 - Create gmail/utils.ts with shared validation functions - Update send.ts to import from utils.ts - Add security validation to compose.ts - Create security tests for utils and compose SUMMARY: .planning/phases/02-security-fixes/02-02-SUMMARY.md

Phase 2 verified: all 7 must-haves passed, 42/42 tests passing Requirements completed: - SEC-01: Drive search escapes single quotes - SEC-02: Gmail compose.ts uses shared validation Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Phase 3: DRY Extraction - parseAttendees duplicated 3x across calendar files - buildEventResult duplicated ~440 lines across operations - encodeToBase64Url already extracted in Phase 2 (complete) - Extraction patterns verified from Phase 2 gmail/utils.ts - exactOptionalPropertyTypes compliance documented

Phase 03: DRY Extraction - 2 plan(s) in 2 wave(s) - Plan 01 (Wave 1): Create parseAttendees and buildEventResult in calendar/utils.ts with tests - Plan 02 (Wave 2): Update read.ts, create.ts, update.ts to use shared utilities - DRY-03 (encodeToBase64Url) already complete from Phase 2 - Ready for execution Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

- Extract canonical parseAttendees from create.ts - Type-safe transformation of Google Calendar API attendees - exactOptionalPropertyTypes compliance with explicit boolean checks - Handles email, displayName, responseStatus, organizer, self, optional fields

- Extract canonical buildEventResult from create.ts - Type-safe transformation of Google Calendar API event to EventResult - Calls parseAttendees internally for consistent attendee parsing - exactOptionalPropertyTypes compliance with conditional assignment - Handles all event fields: basic, creator, organizer, times, recurrence, attendees, conference, attachments, reminders

- 37 test cases covering validateEventTimes, parseAttendees, buildEventResult - Tests for edge cases: undefined, empty arrays, missing fields, all properties - Tests for type safety: null email handling, invalid responseStatus filtering - Tests for exactOptionalPropertyTypes: proper boolean handling - Tests for buildEventResult integration with parseAttendees - All tests passing with TypeScript strict mode

Tasks completed: 3/3 - Added parseAttendees utility to calendar/utils.ts - Added buildEventResult utility to calendar/utils.ts - Created comprehensive test suite (37 tests, all passing) SUMMARY: .planning/phases/03-dry-extraction/03-01-SUMMARY.md

- Import buildEventResult from utils.ts - Remove local parseAttendees function (35 lines) - Replace inline EventResult building (~113 lines) with buildEventResult call - Remove unused Attendee import - Total: ~148 lines removed Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

- Import buildEventResult from utils.ts - Remove local parseAttendees function (42 lines) - Replace inline EventResult building in createEvent (~113 lines) - Replace inline EventResult building in quickAdd (~113 lines) - Update logging to use result.attendees instead of parsedAttendees - Remove unused Attendee import - Total: ~268 lines removed Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

- Import buildEventResult from utils.ts - Remove local parseAttendees function (42 lines) - Replace inline EventResult building (~113 lines) - Remove unused Attendee import - Total: ~155 lines removed Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Tasks completed: 3/3 - Update read.ts to use shared utilities - Update create.ts to use shared utilities - Update update.ts to use shared utilities Phase 3 complete - DRY extraction established 586 lines of duplicate code removed All 107 calendar tests passing SUMMARY: .planning/phases/03-dry-extraction/03-02-SUMMARY.md

- Phase 3 verified: 7/7 must-haves passed - DRY-01: parseAttendees exists only in calendar/utils.ts - DRY-02: buildEventResult exists only in calendar/utils.ts - DRY-03: encodeToBase64Url exists only in gmail/utils.ts (from Phase 2) - 586 lines of duplicate code eliminated - All 107 calendar tests passing Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

All Phase 3 verification tests passed: - Build succeeds - 37/37 calendar utility tests pass - 107/107 calendar module tests pass - No duplicate parseAttendees implementations - buildEventResult properly used in all consumers Also updated CLAUDE.md to clarify that Claude should run commands directly instead of asking user to run them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Phase 04: Validation - Error behavior: throw descriptive, fail fast, standard Error - Validation strictness: all required fields, context-dependent arrays - modifyLabels: pre-validate labels, error on no-op/duplicates - Logging: error level, sanitized excerpts, redact PII

Phase 4: Validation - Standard stack identified (TypeScript native patterns) - Architecture patterns documented (type guards, assertion functions) - Pitfalls catalogued (null handling, PII logging, error messages) - Code examples with sources provided Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Phase 04: Validation - 2 plan(s) in 1 wave(s) - Both parallel (Gmail and Calendar independent) - Ready for execution

Remove legacy bmad agent configs (16 agents across analysis, planning, research, review) and serena project state. Add GSD (Get Shit Done) framework with 11 agents, 27 commands, hooks, workflows, templates, and references. Move completed specs to archive. Add .beads/ to gitignore to exclude local daemon state. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Remove .beads/ local state tracking (replaced by GSD framework), clean up .gitignore, enable frontend-design plugin, and refactor CLAUDE.md into a concise table-driven format (~42% smaller). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

coderabbitai · 2026-02-04T05:22:27Z

Important

Review skipped

Too many files!

This PR contains 174 files, which is 24 over the limit of 150.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

🔍 Trigger a full review

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

Create PR with unit tests
Post copyable unit tests in a comment
Commit unit tests in branch feature/bug-fix-milestone

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

github-actions · 2026-02-04T05:23:27Z

📊 Type Coverage Report

Type Coverage: 97.56%

This PR's TypeScript type coverage analysis is complete.
Check the full report in the workflow artifacts.

github-actions · 2026-02-04T05:27:28Z

Performance Comparison Report

Operation Performance

Operation	Baseline Avg	Current Avg	Change	Status
listFiles	95.0ms	51.8ms	-45.4%	🚀 IMPROVEMENT
readFile	180.0ms	100.6ms	-44.1%	🚀 IMPROVEMENT
createFile	250.0ms	150.1ms	-39.9%	🚀 IMPROVEMENT
cacheOperation	45.0ms	55.0ms	22.3%	❌ REGRESSION

Memory Usage

Baseline: 45.2 MB
Current: 4.41 MB
Change: -90.2%

Summary

🚀 Improvements: 3
❌ Regressions: 1

⚠️ Performance regressions detected! Please review the changes.

Performance report generated by Claude Code

Ossie Irondi and others added 30 commits January 12, 2026 17:17

bd sync: 2026-01-12 17:17:53

38e5dc9

Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/AojdevStudio/gdrive

eb9bd0b

docs(01-01): update modifyLabels tool documentation to use id parameter

8ed4500

- Change signature from messageId to id - Update example to use id parameter - Ensures AI agents see consistent parameter naming

docs(01-01): complete Gmail modifyLabels API consistency plan

46036fd

Tasks completed: 3/3 - Renamed ModifyLabelsOptions/Result.messageId to id - Created 8 unit tests for modifyLabels - Updated tool documentation SUMMARY: .planning/phases/01-api-consistency/01-01-SUMMARY.md

docs(02-01): complete Drive search query escaping plan

7b4a8dd

Tasks completed: 2/2 - Add escapeQueryValue function and update search functions - Create Drive search security tests SUMMARY: .planning/phases/02-security-fixes/02-01-SUMMARY.md

docs(02): complete Security Fixes phase

d8706d2

Phase 2 verified: all 7 must-haves passed, 42/42 tests passing Requirements completed: - SEC-01: Drive search escapes single quotes - SEC-02: Gmail compose.ts uses shared validation Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Ossie Irondi and others added 13 commits January 25, 2026 16:46

docs(04): create phase plan

28d1c31

Phase 04: Validation - 2 plan(s) in 1 wave(s) - Both parallel (Gmail and Calendar independent) - Ready for execution

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

feat: complete bug fix milestone with API, security, and DRY improvements#35

feat: complete bug fix milestone with API, security, and DRY improvements#35
Jarvis-AojDevStuio wants to merge 43 commits intomainfrom
feature/bug-fix-milestone

Jarvis-AojDevStuio commented Feb 4, 2026

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 4, 2026

Review skipped

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

Conversation

Jarvis-AojDevStuio commented Feb 4, 2026

Summary

Phase 1: API Consistency

Phase 2: Security Fixes

Phase 3: DRY Extraction

Phase 4: Validation (Planning)

Tooling & Infrastructure

Type of Change

Test Plan

Files Changed

Checklist

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 4, 2026

Review skipped

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2026

📊 Type Coverage Report

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2026

Performance Comparison Report

Operation Performance

Memory Usage

Summary

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant