Skip to content

Conversation

@tvdeyen
Copy link
Member

@tvdeyen tvdeyen commented Dec 23, 2025

Summary

  • Adds the rubygems_api_key secret to the release workflow call
  • Required for the reusable release workflow to publish gems to RubyGems

Test plan

  • Verify the workflow syntax is valid
  • Test by triggering a release

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 23, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.62%. Comparing base (bd92fd5) to head (411686a).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #245   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.62%   98.62%           
=======================================
  Files          11       11           
  Lines         291      291           
=======================================
  Hits          287      287           
  Misses          4        4           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

The reusable release workflow requires the RUBYGEMS_API_KEY secret
to publish gems to RubyGems.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@tvdeyen tvdeyen force-pushed the add-rubygems-api-key-secret branch from 55247df to 411686a Compare December 23, 2025 17:23
@tvdeyen tvdeyen merged commit 05cce47 into main Dec 23, 2025
39 checks passed
@tvdeyen tvdeyen deleted the add-rubygems-api-key-secret branch December 23, 2025 17:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants