remove info about AG VPN protocol #320
Conversation
![windsurf-bot[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1066231?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
Preview was deployed to: https://pull-request-320.kb-vpn.pages.dev/ |
1 similar comment
|
Preview was deployed to: https://pull-request-320.kb-vpn.pages.dev/ |
|
Preview was deployed to: https://pull-request-320.kb-vpn.pages.dev/ |
ameshkov
left a comment
ameshkov
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's not "proprietary" and not "our own".
This is a modern protocol that we developed, but it's open source and can be used by anyone.
This reverts commit e788478.
|
Preview was deployed to: https://pull-request-320.kb-vpn.pages.dev/ |
|
Preview was deployed to: https://pull-request-320.kb-vpn.pages.dev/ |
|
Honestly, I like the original high-level (essentially sales) doc! It clearly had a lot of work put into it, & it'd be a shame to lose the previously-included access to it. The vast majority of end users would be completely satisfied w/ it. TrustTunnel, imho, has complementary purposes that benefit the above. It's to protect us users by verifying the integrity of the claims in the above docs, via the eyes of whichever hackers (classic sense) choose to (to be honest) try to break the protocol &/or implementation(s). Is it possible to keep the former & just update to include the latter for the relatively few who could appreciate it more? |
|
Preview was deployed to: https://pull-request-320.kb-vpn.pages.dev/ |
|
Preview was deployed to: https://pull-request-320.kb-vpn.pages.dev/ |
1 similar comment
|
Preview was deployed to: https://pull-request-320.kb-vpn.pages.dev/ |
|
Preview was deployed to: https://pull-request-320.kb-vpn.pages.dev/ |
No description provided.