List view
Goal: To get app to a state where we can start upgrading it just through Issues. To do that, we'll introduce a revise on PR comment workflow. When a user provides a comment or a review on a PR, then we'll take that review and suggest further edits. This allows some guidance from humans. There's 2 tracks: 1. If PR was AI generated. Then there's an AI trace that we can edit. 2. If PR was human generated. Then we'll have to identify what's wrong, and generate a new AI trace. Let's start with #2, since that's where Patrick is. And I think most people would love something to adapt to their current workflow of human-generated PRs. Upon review, the AI will have to break down the problem: 1. Identify what the PR is trying to achieve. a. If there's an attached issue, this would be a good place to start. 2. Identify what the PR achieves. 3. Review the PR review 4. Identify why the PR did not achieve its goals 5. Generate changes that would address the issues 6. Create a new PR, and quote the old PR. Users will be able to configure whether or not PR is merged to current working branch, or directly to main.
No due date