feat: add support for the fabrica coding agent#567
Open
Endi1 wants to merge 3 commits into
Open
Conversation
Owner
|
Thanks for the PR. Could you share a little more about the state of the agent? Do you consider it ready for wider adoption? Known limitations, specially with agent-shell? I probably won't have time to try it out myself (due to #500), but can you post some screenshots so I can at least see the integration with welcome screen and graphical header? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds support for my personal minimalistic coding agent harness: https://github.com/Endi1/fabrica (ACP support is through an ACP server built into the agent itself)
Since I mostly use any coding agents from emacs through agent-shell, it would be nice if it'd have official support for fabrica in case the number of users increases to more than one, and if not, I'd be happy to maintain a fork for it anyway :)
Checklist
M-x checkdocandM-x byte-compile-file.