context_pack/
README.md
manifest.json
MAP/
index.json
SPEC/
report.schema.md
EVIDENCE/
top_findings/
ARTIFACTS/
report.json
event_graph.json
api_surface.json
quality_gate.json
backend_verifier_report.json
patterns.json
Goal: prepare a safe backend maintenance plan for the next sprint.
Suggested flow:
- read
README.md+MAP/index.json - inspect
quality_gate.json - inspect
backend_verifier_report.* - inspect
patterns.jsonandai_risks/risks.json - open top evidence refs for uncertain items
Output expectation:
- scoped maintenance checklist
- high/medium transaction-side-effect risks
- explicit unknowns requiring drilldown
Facts-only phase:
- identify queue.dispatch without observed consume
- identify write-like API without explicit guard
Drilldown phase (only if needed):
- open evidence-linked files/ranges
- confirm whether consumer/guard signals appear near evidence regions
- keep confirmed/inferred/unknown separated
Given baseline inputs:
baseline_in.jsonbaseline_diff.jsonquality_gate.json
Use Context Pack to:
- compare new transaction/side-effect signals vs baseline
- identify newly introduced medium/high risk patterns
- prepare upgrade notes for next AI-assisted modification round
This is evidence-backed upgrade context support, not a guarantee of safe upgrades.