If sometimes happens that there is a huge increase in loss in a single step. Increasing the penalty changes the objective function, but it may also be possible that the objective is well behaved but the optimization procedure is not. Is it possible to take more conservative steps somehow to mitigate divergences without changing the prior? (In analogy with deep learning/sgd, where controlling the stepsize can be crucial.)
Iteration: 0 | deviance=1.7062E+7
Iteration: 1 | deviance=1.6108E+7
Iteration: 2 | deviance=1.2395E+7
Iteration: 3 | deviance=5.1439E+15
Iteration: 4 | deviance=2.1030E+49
Iteration: 5 | deviance=3.5205E+44
Iteration: 6 | deviance=5.8820E+39
Iteration: 7 | deviance=9.8265E+34
Iteration: 8 | deviance=1.6415E+30
Iteration: 9 | deviance=2.7422E+25
Iteration: 10 | deviance=8.0801E+21
If sometimes happens that there is a huge increase in loss in a single step. Increasing the penalty changes the objective function, but it may also be possible that the objective is well behaved but the optimization procedure is not. Is it possible to take more conservative steps somehow to mitigate divergences without changing the prior? (In analogy with deep learning/sgd, where controlling the stepsize can be crucial.)