Currently the package creates a new worker for each acquire and the pool is more of a cache for checking length and cleanup.
Are there any thoughts around looking to add an option to reuse workers via channel messages if they have the same filenames?
Currently the package creates a new worker for each acquire and the
poolis more of acachefor checking length and cleanup.Are there any thoughts around looking to add an option to reuse workers via channel messages if they have the same filenames?