verapdf's UA-2 validation currently checks that math is directly contained in Formula
<rule specification="ISO 14289-2:2024" clause="8.2.5.29" testNumber="1" status="failed" failedChecks="1" tags="structure">
<description>The math structure type shall occur only as a child of a Formula structure element</description>
However it is intended that this clause is to be interpreted more loosely and allow math elements that are nested within an ancestor Formula not to require a nested Formula.This is explicit in the math in PDF best practice guide currently in private draft at pdf association.
LaTeX generates tagged pdf assuming this interpretation and we just had a public comment that files are failing validation
latex3/tagging-project#1168
The LaTeX that is in the issue generates the attached PF which currently (verapdf 1.28.2) gives the verapdf warning shown above
nm1.pdf
would it be possible to allow any math with ancestor Formula in the UA-2 profile?
verapdf's UA-2 validation currently checks that
mathis directly contained inFormulaHowever it is intended that this clause is to be interpreted more loosely and allow
mathelements that are nested within an ancestorFormulanot to require a nestedFormula.This is explicit in the math in PDF best practice guide currently in private draft at pdf association.LaTeX generates tagged pdf assuming this interpretation and we just had a public comment that files are failing validation
latex3/tagging-project#1168
The LaTeX that is in the issue generates the attached PF which currently (verapdf 1.28.2) gives the verapdf warning shown above
nm1.pdf
would it be possible to allow any
mathwith ancestorFormulain the UA-2 profile?