Skip to content

Overhaul: packages #1669

@josecelano

Description

@josecelano

Relates to: #1659

  1. Review their descriptions (README)
  2. Review their boundaries (are they loosely coupled and highly cohesive?)
  3. Review whether we should fix all of them to the same version or evolve their version separately.
  4. Review if we should move them to separate repos (the ones that are more decoupled and have more potencial to be reused)
  5. Review potencial performance problems for new contributors loading such a huge repo into their IDEs
  6. ...

Package diagrams (on internal Miro):

Image

I'm planning to run other tools like:

cc @da2ce7

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

EPICContains several subissues

Type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions