Skip to content

side chain spec #3

@mixmix

Description

@mixmix

Questions:

  1. Is this being redesigned?
    • where / when?
    • how does one participate?
  2. why do the "side-chain" packets on have a packet_type code (T)?

Here's a design from some earlier spec... no idea if it matches implentations

  <--------------120B packet content---------->
          <------48B payload----->
  +----+-+------------------------+- . . . ---+
  | DMX|T| len | content1 | hptr1 | signature |   log entry
  +----+-+-----+----------+-------+- . . . ---+
                              |
     -------------------------' start of side chain (hash of blob 1)
    /
   v     100B                            20B
  +----------. . . . . . . . . .------+-------+
  | content2                          | hptr2 |   blob 1, identfied by hptr1
  +----------. . . . . . . . . .------+-------+
                                         |
                        - - -------------' continuation of side chain
     -------------- - - -
    /
   v     100B                            20B
  +----------. . . . . . . . . .------+-------+
  | contentN         |  padding       | 0---0 |  last blob N-1
  +----------. . . . . . . . . .------+-------+

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions