Hello wtmpdb developers =)
in the Debian Mailing list there is currently a hot discussion related to use wtmpdb as an alternative to utmp
I tied it out and reported some issues of your last implementation to the Debian maintainer of the wtmpdb package
[wishlist] last -p <RFC-3339 TIME> and last -p <ISO-8601 TIME>
Related to the report above: Would be nice if <TIME> fully accepts RFC-3339 (and ISO-8601) format. For RFC-3339 the following example should work, which is equivalent to last -p now
$> last -p "$(date --rfc-3339=seconds)"
Invalid time value '2025-04-05 04:26:47+02:00'
Greets,
Dirk =)
Hello
wtmpdbdevelopers =)in the Debian Mailing list there is currently a hot discussion related to use
wtmpdbas an alternative toutmpI tied it out and reported some issues of your
lastimplementation to the Debian maintainer of thewtmpdbpackageFound in version wtmpdb/0.72.0-1https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1102101
[wishlist]
last -p <RFC-3339 TIME>andlast -p <ISO-8601 TIME>Related to the report above: Would be nice if
<TIME>fully accepts RFC-3339 (and ISO-8601) format. For RFC-3339 the following example should work, which is equivalent tolast -p nowGreets,
Dirk =)