Currently batch reassignment of sample sets is based on ids, but for clarity should be based on names. I had a go at this but with the current implementation it is trickier than anticipated. Basically, the individuals_table needs a new column with the current sample set name which is defined in the sample_sets_table. However, the latter is editable and is updated from time to time with new sample sets, which would need propagation to the individuals_table. Currently, the tables are sort of oblivious to each other's existence.
Currently batch reassignment of sample sets is based on ids, but for clarity should be based on names. I had a go at this but with the current implementation it is trickier than anticipated. Basically, the individuals_table needs a new column with the current sample set name which is defined in the sample_sets_table. However, the latter is editable and is updated from time to time with new sample sets, which would need propagation to the individuals_table. Currently, the tables are sort of oblivious to each other's existence.