For example, the field TargetProgress has the same prefix Target with the union prefix in previous columns.
| ID |
TargetType |
TargetField1 |
TargetField2 |
TargetField3 |
TargetProgress |
| map<int32, Task> |
{.Target}enum<.Target.Type> |
union |
union |
union |
int32 |
| ID |
Target's type |
Target's field1 |
Target's field2 |
Target's field3 |
Progress |
| 1 |
PVP |
1 |
10 |
Apple,Orange,Banana |
3 |
But currently, the confgen works fine even if column names are not in order. So this is under discusion whether there is need to resolve it?
For example, the field
TargetProgresshas the same prefixTargetwith the union prefix in previous columns.But currently, the confgen works fine even if column names are not in order. So this is under discusion whether there is need to resolve it?