Skip to content

💡 Feature Request - Investigate Flexibility of Special handlers throughout the Longitudinal Pipeline #66

@simonprovost

Description

@simonprovost

🌟 Howdy Innovator! Got a groundbreaking idea for Scikit-longitudinal? We'd love to hear it! 🌟

Before you submit this feature request, consider the following:

  • Have you checked if this feature already exists or has been requested before?
  • Does this feature align with the goals and scope of Scikit-longitudinal?

If you do not know about the above, feel free to open a question based Github-issue.

🤔 What's the Problem?

I believe it would be worthwhile to investigate more in depth to what extent the Special handlers all around the Longitudinal pipeline workflow are and especially if they are robust enough for long-lasting of the PIpeline module.

🎯 The Dream Solution

Special handlers being robust enough. Especially the CFS primitives.

🔄 Alternatives

Rewrite entirely the Longitudinal Pipeline.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

ClassificationRelated content to classificationhelp wantedExtra attention is needed

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions