Auto merge of #45267 - oconnor663:rwlock_send, r=alexcrichton

remove the `T: Sync` requirement for `RwLock<T>: Send`

That requirement makes sense for containers like `Arc` that don't
uniquely own their contents, but `RwLock` is not one of those.

This restriction was added in 380d23b, but it's not clear why. @hniksic
and I [were discussing this on reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/763o7r/blog_posts_introducing_lockfree_rust_comparing/dobcvbm/). I might be totally wrong about this change being sound, but I'm super curious to find out :)

Author: bors

src/libstd/sync/rwlock.rs

@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ pub struct RwLock<T: ?Sized> {
 }
 
 #[stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")]
-unsafe impl<T: ?Sized + Send + Sync> Send for RwLock<T> {}
+unsafe impl<T: ?Sized + Send> Send for RwLock<T> {}
 #[stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")]
 unsafe impl<T: ?Sized + Send + Sync> Sync for RwLock<T> {}