Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
|
Try running it at trace level 3 and look for any relevant messages, any error or 'unsupported' trace messages. Btw could I ask the extent of coverage on BeiDou with this ublox now, is it just C09 and C10 that have the 7I observation with all the rest, BDS3 satellites, having only 2I? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Tried with some f9p data from the last 24hr and it did decode the nav data for Galileo. Tested using the 'main' branch code. Checked the BDS signals and can confirm that 7I is only reported on the two remaining BDS2 satellites, C09 C10, and not on the BDS3 satellites. Do see those spots of 7I on BDS3 and guess that is some glitch as they have no 7I signal. Also for BDS2 it did include L7I. Perhaps check the SNR of the signals and try getting some cleaner data and retry. Otherwise can you make some raw data available to check. Alternatively might a RTCM stream with the nav data be an option. Also there is some code being tested that allows downloaded predicted nav and clock data to be used so that the receiver works without and broadcast data. If post processing then it is possible to download the broadcast nav data, e.g. see the IGS data. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
I am using
convbinto convert a u-blox ZED-F9P UBX raw log into RINEX 3.04. The UBX file containsRXM-RAWXandRXM-SFRBXmessages.The conversion successfully generates:
.obs.navThe observation file contains GPS, Galileo and BeiDou observations, but the navigation file only contains GPS and BeiDou ephemerides. No Galileo
E##navigation records are written.Receiver / input data
UBX-RXM-RAWXUBX-RXM-SFRBXconvbin version is the one downloaded from CONVBIN demo5 b34d
The help output shows support for: u-blox LEA-4T/5T/6T/8/9 : RXM-RAW, RXM-RAWX, RXM-SFRB
Command used:
convbin.exe -r ubx -v 3.04 -od -os -oi -ot -ol -d ./rinex ./raw/ublox_base_raw_20260524.ubx
I also tried with the "EPHALL" AND "GALINAV" options, but no Galileo navigation record were generated.
The .obs file contains Galileo observations:
3.04 OBSERVATION DATA M: Mixed RINEX VERSION / TYPE
G 8 C1C L1C D1C S1C C2X L2X D2X S2X SYS / # / OBS TYPES
E 8 C1X L1X D1X S1X C7X L7X D7X S7X SYS / # / OBS TYPES
C 7 C2I L2I D2I S2I C7I D7I S7I SYS / # / OBS TYPES
And Galileo satellites are also present in the observation epochs.
The .nav file contains GPS and BeiDou ephemerides, however, o Galileo records are present.
I parsed the UBX file directly and counted RXM-SFRBX messages by constellation. Galileo SFRBX messages are present in large numbers:
SFRBX messages by constellation:
0: GPS -> 3439 messages
2: Galileo -> 15277 messages
3: BeiDou -> 2252 messages
The Galileo SFRBX messages are present on these signal IDs:
Galileo sigId=1 -> present
Galileo sigId=5 -> present
In summary, no Galileo navigation records are generated in the RINEX NAV file, even though Galileo RXM-SFRBX messages are present in the UBX log. Is this expected behavior for this convbin build, or could this be a bug/limitation in the u-blox RXM-SFRBX Galileo I/NAV decoding path?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions