This document defines the methodological approach used to build and maintain the Robotaxi Reference Framework.
Its purpose is to:
- ensure analytical rigor
- make assumptions explicit
- enable auditability
- prevent interpretative drift over time
The methodology is descriptive and analytical, not prescriptive or advisory.
The framework follows a system-oriented, evidence-based methodology.
Key characteristics:
- system-level analysis over component-level detail
- structure before interpretation
- boundaries before conclusions
- evidence before synthesis
No conclusions are drawn without explicit linkage to documented sources.
All analysis is grounded in a strict evidence hierarchy:
- international standards (ISO, IEC, ETSI, SAE)
- binding regulations and legal instruments
- official regulatory frameworks
These sources define hard constraints.
- published guidance by regulatory authorities
- documented approval, reporting and oversight practices
- official compliance frameworks
These sources define operational interpretation.
- publicly disclosed operational data
- safety case publications
- transparency reports of active operators
These sources provide illustrative evidence only and do not override Tier 1 or Tier 2 constraints.
Each source must meet all of the following criteria:
- official publisher or issuing authority
- publicly accessible
- versioned or datable
- stable and citable
- directly relevant to robotaxi systems
All accepted sources are listed exhaustively in SOURCES.md.
Sources outside this list are treated as non-authoritative for this release.
Content is structured consistently across the following dimensions:
-
System Definition
What the system is — and is not. -
Technical Constraints
Safety, cybersecurity, software lifecycle and interfaces. -
Regulatory Structure
Legal obligations, approval models and audit requirements. -
Operational Reality
Deployment, scaling and long-term operation. -
Economic Structure
Cost persistence, capital requirements and sustainability. -
Societal Context
Trust, accountability and institutional legitimacy.
Each dimension is treated as interdependent, not as an isolated layer.
The framework is strictly vendor-neutral.
Commercial entities may be referenced only when:
- unavoidable for empirical illustration
- publicly documented
- clearly labeled as non-exclusive examples
No vendor is:
- endorsed
- ranked
- promoted
- treated as representative of the market
Uncertainty is treated as a structural property, not as a gap to be filled with speculation.
Where evidence is incomplete:
- uncertainty is stated explicitly
- boundaries are defined
- no extrapolation is performed
Future developments are not assumed, forecasted or implied.
This framework follows a frozen-release model.
- Content reflects the state of evidence at the release date.
- Changes are not incorporated continuously.
- Updates occur only via explicit new releases.
Any future update must:
- declare its release ID
- document changes explicitly
- preserve backward traceability
The methodology is designed to support auditability.
An audit must be able to:
- trace every analytical claim to a source tier
- identify assumptions clearly
- verify consistency across documents and pages
The baseline for audits is defined in SCOPE.md.
This methodology applies equally to:
- the GitHub repository
- the Robotaxi.de website
- all derived reference materials
No divergence between repo and website methodology is permitted.
- Release ID: 1.0.0
- Freeze Date: 2026-02-03
- Status: Frozen
This methodology is binding for the corresponding frozen website release.