Anything which is submitted from the user side for review by moderators should be reviewed as following -
- An article is submitted for review
- All moderators are able to see the article waiting for approval
- Multiple moderators answer a series of questions like - "Is this article good?" and the responses will be recorded
- After a threshold amount of moderators have responded, a function will calculate the final score based on responses to determine whether the article should be approved or not.
- If approved, the article becomes public
- If rejected, the article becomes rejected
In both final scenarios, the author of the article should be able to view stats regarding the questions & answers in the form of charts & graphs.
The same logic will be applied to project verification & other similar things as well. In case of projects where a moderator is also assigned to it after approval, questions should also include - "Would you like to be a moderator of this project?" and based on the answers, a relevant moderator should be assigned automatically after approval.
Anything which is submitted from the user side for review by moderators should be reviewed as following -
In both final scenarios, the author of the article should be able to view stats regarding the questions & answers in the form of charts & graphs.
The same logic will be applied to project verification & other similar things as well. In case of projects where a moderator is also assigned to it after approval, questions should also include - "Would you like to be a moderator of this project?" and based on the answers, a relevant moderator should be assigned automatically after approval.