Commit 56be4b1
amcmanigal
Fixing Subschema Required Properties Validation
Currently if valid swagger syntax is used for model composition an
error will be thrown due to the lack of a type property. This was
corrected by making object the default type.
schema_type = schema_deref.get('type', 'object')
I changed the swagger definition to test for this. Now PetCreate is a
composite of PetCreatePartOne and PetCreatePartTwo. However, this
caused `test_post_pets_empty_body` to fail, which turned out to be a
bug in the required properties.
In `_unmarshal_object` the `get_all_properties` method is called to get
all properties from the subschemas. However, this is not done for
required properties, meaning that only top level required properties
will be correctly validated. I have added a
`get_all_required_properties’ to fix this.
This caused `test_get_pets` to fail. In this case the bug allowed an
incorrect test case to be introduced. Pet requires `id`, but it also
requires name because it inherits from PetCreate. I have fixed this
test case by adding the missing required property.
After these changes `test_get_pet_not_found` failed due to a string
formatting error (double quotes vs single quotes). I fixed this by
switching to dictionary comparisons.1 parent 8d92c25 commit 56be4b1
File tree
5 files changed
+27
-4
lines changed- openapi_core
- tests/integration
- data/v3.0
5 files changed
+27
-4
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
99 | 99 | | |
100 | 100 | | |
101 | 101 | | |
| 102 | + | |
| 103 | + | |
| 104 | + | |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
63 | 63 | | |
64 | 64 | | |
65 | 65 | | |
| 66 | + | |
| 67 | + | |
| 68 | + | |
| 69 | + | |
| 70 | + | |
| 71 | + | |
| 72 | + | |
| 73 | + | |
| 74 | + | |
66 | 75 | | |
67 | 76 | | |
68 | 77 | | |
| |||
121 | 130 | | |
122 | 131 | | |
123 | 132 | | |
| 133 | + | |
124 | 134 | | |
125 | 135 | | |
126 | 136 | | |
| |||
135 | 145 | | |
136 | 146 | | |
137 | 147 | | |
138 | | - | |
| 148 | + | |
139 | 149 | | |
140 | 150 | | |
141 | 151 | | |
| |||
167 | 177 | | |
168 | 178 | | |
169 | 179 | | |
170 | | - | |
| 180 | + | |
171 | 181 | | |
172 | 182 | | |
173 | 183 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
144 | 144 | | |
145 | 145 | | |
146 | 146 | | |
147 | | - | |
148 | 147 | | |
| 148 | + | |
| 149 | + | |
| 150 | + | |
| 151 | + | |
| 152 | + | |
| 153 | + | |
149 | 154 | | |
150 | 155 | | |
151 | 156 | | |
| |||
155 | 160 | | |
156 | 161 | | |
157 | 162 | | |
| 163 | + | |
| 164 | + | |
| 165 | + | |
| 166 | + | |
158 | 167 | | |
159 | 168 | | |
160 | 169 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
654 | 654 | | |
655 | 655 | | |
656 | 656 | | |
657 | | - | |
| 657 | + | |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
245 | 245 | | |
246 | 246 | | |
247 | 247 | | |
| 248 | + | |
248 | 249 | | |
249 | 250 | | |
250 | 251 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments