Consider making the software license part of the dependency #264
eric-nieuwland
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Currently, the software dependencies first are first split into 'dependsOn/open' and 'dependsOn/proprietary' lists before being defined.
No further details to the nature of the license can be specified.
The suggestion here is to merge 'dependsOn/open' and 'dependsOn/proprietary' into 'dependsOn/software', while adding 'license' to the definition of 'dependency'. This will allow to use 'open' or 'proprietary' as value for 'license', but also a SPDX license expression (see https://spdx.org/licenses/) or simply 'commercial'.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions