Also see this.
Right now, it is not a fixed convention in pi base whether $0$ is a natural number and we usually avoid talking about it.
It is famously disputed, but it seems like $0 \in \mathbb{N}$ is now the overwhelming opinion (making $(\mathbb{N},+)$ a monoid, for example also in Lean.
So stating that $0 \in \mathbb{N}$ in say the wiki, would likely be beneficial.
On a similar note, using $\omega$ very often (as is the case right now) might be mathematically alright, but I doubt anyone who has not done set theory really knows about that convention. So while you can easily google it, why make it harder for most people for no reason?
Also see this.
Right now, it is not a fixed convention in pi base whether$0$ is a natural number and we usually avoid talking about it.$0 \in \mathbb{N}$ is now the overwhelming opinion (making $(\mathbb{N},+)$ a monoid, for example also in Lean.
It is famously disputed, but it seems like
So stating that$0 \in \mathbb{N}$ in say the wiki, would likely be beneficial.
On a similar note, using$\omega$ very often (as is the case right now) might be mathematically alright, but I doubt anyone who has not done set theory really knows about that convention. So while you can easily google it, why make it harder for most people for no reason?