Note to self:
It would be valuable to explicitly draw a parallel between the complyr compliance testing philosophy and Karl Popper’s concept of falsifiability. Both approaches reject definitive proof and instead focus on rigorous, structured attempts to disprove or challenge a claim (in our case, conformity with a standard).
Consider adding a short section in the README or a vignette that explains this philosophical alignment. It could help frame complyr not only as a technical tool but also as an epistemologically grounded approach to software quality and regulatory trust.
Note to self:
It would be valuable to explicitly draw a parallel between the
complyrcompliance testing philosophy and Karl Popper’s concept of falsifiability. Both approaches reject definitive proof and instead focus on rigorous, structured attempts to disprove or challenge a claim (in our case, conformity with a standard).Consider adding a short section in the README or a vignette that explains this philosophical alignment. It could help frame
complyrnot only as a technical tool but also as an epistemologically grounded approach to software quality and regulatory trust.