Summary
Adding a high-nominal currency country like Sweden stretches the comparison chart gross range far beyond the intended baseline.
Reproduction
- Open the calculator comparison view.
- Compare countries with synced salaries in mixed currencies, e.g. US, CH, GR, PT, IT, then add Sweden.
- Open the progression chart.
Actual
The chart upper bound jumps to values derived from the highest local-currency gross amount (for example SEK), which then gets reused for every country. This makes the net salary chart run into multi-million gross ranges that do not reflect the shared baseline.
Expected
The progression chart range should be normalized to a shared baseline currency, and each country should be evaluated at its own local-currency gross equivalent for each x-axis point.
Notes
Current implementation appears to derive / from raw form values and sends the same numeric progression points to all countries, even when those countries use different currencies.
Summary
Adding a high-nominal currency country like Sweden stretches the comparison chart gross range far beyond the intended baseline.
Reproduction
Actual
The chart upper bound jumps to values derived from the highest local-currency gross amount (for example SEK), which then gets reused for every country. This makes the net salary chart run into multi-million gross ranges that do not reflect the shared baseline.
Expected
The progression chart range should be normalized to a shared baseline currency, and each country should be evaluated at its own local-currency gross equivalent for each x-axis point.
Notes
Current implementation appears to derive / from raw form values and sends the same numeric progression points to all countries, even when those countries use different currencies.