REPLY_RAW format seemingly at odds with IEC 60839-11-5:2020

[mpfj]

Describe the bug
Looking at the code, I can see the reply format for RAW card reads.
However, this does not match IEC 60839-11-5:2020 which we are working against.

Expected behavior
For example, the IEC standard shows 2 bytes for the reply data size, whereas you only have 1.

I see that the SIA spec is 2.2.2 published in 2024.
So is the IEC standard now "out-of-date"?
If so, shouldn't some backward compatibility be required?

[sidcha]

Hi @mpfj, Can you please post a screenshot of what you are looking at? I checked v2.2 and v2.1.5 (predates the IEC version) of the spec and both seems to agree (with code) that data can be arbitrary length.

Also "whereas you only have 1" -- where are you seeing this?