fix: restore correct ADR path in architect skill (#857)

Author: carlos-alm

.claude/skills/architect/SKILL.md

@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ For each architectural layer, evaluate against these dimensions:
 - Where does the tool present incomplete data as complete?
 
 **F. ADR Compliance**
-- Does the implementation match the decisions documented in `generated/architecture/decisions/`?
+- Does the implementation match the decisions documented in `docs/architecture/decisions/`?
 - Are the trade-offs described in ADRs still accurate given the current code?
 - Has the codebase drifted from any stated trajectory? If so, is that drift justified or accidental?
 - Are there architectural decisions that *should* have an ADR but don't?
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ The deliverable must contain:
 - "Does Codegraph Have a Reason to Exist?" section (verified competitor data)
 - Executive summary (1 paragraph, brutally honest)
 - Scorecard (each dimension rated 1-10 with justification)
-- **ADR compliance review** — for each ADR in `generated/architecture/decisions/`, assess whether the codebase follows the decision, whether the stated trade-offs are still valid, and whether any drift has occurred. Flag missing ADRs for decisions that exist in code but aren't documented
+- **ADR compliance review** — for each ADR in `docs/architecture/decisions/`, assess whether the codebase follows the decision, whether the stated trade-offs are still valid, and whether any drift has occurred. Flag missing ADRs for decisions that exist in code but aren't documented
 - Detailed findings per layer
 - Verified competitor comparison table
 - Strategic recommendations (prioritized)