DNM: Test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic/+/985123 on PR821#835
DNM: Test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic/+/985123 on PR821#835MahnoorAsghar wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
WalkthroughTwo git-based dependency pins in Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 9 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (9 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: MahnoorAsghar The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@requirements.cachito`:
- Line 1: The requirements.cachito entry pins the 'ironic' dependency to a
personal fork (MahnoorAsghar/openstack-ironic@18e0706f...), which must not be
merged; update the pin to use the approved upstream repository
(openshift/openstack-ironic) and the intended commit (or backport the commit to
that upstream repo) so the requirements.cachito line for the 'ironic' package
references openshift/openstack-ironic@<upstream-commit> instead of the personal
fork; ensure the chosen commit exists in openshift/openstack-ironic before
updating.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 842f44dc-79ce-4846-92f4-038d4fcc0e69
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
requirements.cachito
| @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | |||
| ironic @ git+https://github.com/openshift/openstack-ironic@f8686d33cf45e128c7d58e055c0c0ddf27e3d959 | |||
| sushy @ git+https://github.com/openshift/openstack-sushy@5a6b97ea02edae6f709a3ced09db7c88c57ae5ef | |||
| ironic @ git+https://github.com/MahnoorAsghar/openstack-ironic@18e0706f0420984aa5c424adbb08e357e7f82fec | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Personal fork pin must not be merged.
ironic is pinned to MahnoorAsghar/openstack-ironic, a personal fork. This is consistent with the PR being marked DNM, but flagging for visibility: before this PR can merge, the ironic source must be restored to openshift/openstack-ironic (with the intended upstream commit backported there). A personal fork as a build source is not acceptable for production image builds consumed by Dockerfile.ocp's wheel-builder stage.
🔧 Proposed revert before merge
-ironic @ git+https://github.com/MahnoorAsghar/openstack-ironic@18e0706f0420984aa5c424adbb08e357e7f82fec
+ironic @ git+https://github.com/openshift/openstack-ironic@<commit-sha-on-openshift-fork>🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@requirements.cachito` at line 1, The requirements.cachito entry pins the
'ironic' dependency to a personal fork
(MahnoorAsghar/openstack-ironic@18e0706f...), which must not be merged; update
the pin to use the approved upstream repository (openshift/openstack-ironic) and
the intended commit (or backport the commit to that upstream repo) so the
requirements.cachito line for the 'ironic' package references
openshift/openstack-ironic@<upstream-commit> instead of the personal fork;
ensure the chosen commit exists in openshift/openstack-ironic before updating.
|
Lets see if e2e-metal-ipi-bm passes here |
cb17eaf to
3bc4377
Compare
|
@MahnoorAsghar: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Summary by CodeRabbit