Skip to content

Conversation

@mpdonova
Copy link
Contributor

@mpdonova mpdonova commented Dec 4, 2025

This PR updates a couple test utility classes, JdkClient and JdkServer. Theseclasses extend AbstractPeer which contains a namedGroup field however, when creating/configuring the objects, the field is ignored. This PR just makes sure to include named groups if they are specified.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8373101: JdkClient and JdkServer test classes ignore namedGroups field (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28664/head:pull/28664
$ git checkout pull/28664

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28664
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28664/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28664

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28664

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28664.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 4, 2025

👋 Welcome back mdonovan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 4, 2025

@mpdonova This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8373101: JdkClient and JdkServer test classes ignore namedGroups field

Reviewed-by: rhalade

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 4 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the security security-dev@openjdk.org label Dec 4, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 4, 2025

@mpdonova The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • security

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 4, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 4, 2025

Webrevs


if (builder.getNamedGroups() != null
&& builder.getNamedGroups().length > 0) {
NamedGroup[] namedGroups = builder.getNamedGroups();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor: Do you think moving it outside of the if statement and making the if statement call namedGroups directly might be a bit easier to read? Otherwise you're calling the same action 3 times in a row

String[] namedGroupStrs = new String[namedGroups.length];
for (int i = 0 ; i < namedGroups.length ; ++i) {
namedGroupStrs[i] = namedGroups[i].name;
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: what do you think?

Suggested change
}
String[] namedGroupStrs = Arrays.stream(namedGroups)
.map(NamedGroup::name)
.toArray(String[]::new);

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 9, 2025
@mpdonova
Copy link
Contributor Author

mpdonova commented Dec 9, 2025

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 9, 2025

Going to push as commit 1ae4a6c.
Since your change was applied there have been 5 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Dec 9, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 9, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 9, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 9, 2025

@mpdonova Pushed as commit 1ae4a6c.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

integrated Pull request has been integrated security security-dev@openjdk.org

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants