8372589: VM crashes on init when NonNMethodCodeHeapSize is set too small and UseTransparentHugePages is enabled

[dbriemann]

Aligning upwards instead of downwards not only solves the crash in large huge page scenarios but also ensures that the cache sizes are at least as big as they were set.

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change must be properly reviewed (2 reviews required, with at least 1 Reviewer, 1 Author)

Issue

• JDK-8372589: VM crashes on init when NonNMethodCodeHeapSize is set too small and UseTransparentHugePages is enabled (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

• Martin Doerr (@TheRealMDoerr - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28658/head:pull/28658
$ git checkout pull/28658

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28658
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28658/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28658

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28658

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28658.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back dbriemann! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@dbriemann This change is no longer ready for integration - check the PR body for details.

[openjdk]

@dbriemann The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (346e7d4c)

[TheRealMDoerr]

This make sense. Please make sure to commit it when JDK27 is started in head and after a 2nd review.
/reviewers 2

[openjdk]

@TheRealMDoerr
The total number of required reviews for this PR (including the jcheck configuration and the last /reviewers command) is now set to 2 (with at least 1 Reviewer, 1 Author).

[dbriemann]

Hi @chhagedorn since you had a look at the ticket, would you be willing to review this PR? Thanks.