Skip to content

chore(planning): calibrate S M L XL effort estimates against historical PR sizes #596

@ohdearquant

Description

@ohdearquant

Body:

  • Problem: roadmap effort estimates are currently S/M/L/XL and were not calibrated against historical PR sizes, which weakens schedule confidence.
  • Proposed fix: compute historical PR size and cycle-time buckets for comparable khive changes, then publish a local calibration table used by the roadmap.
  • Acceptance criteria: calibration table maps S/M/L/XL to observed changed-file and line-count ranges; at least three historical examples support each non-empty bucket; roadmap estimates cite the calibration artifact; outliers are documented.
  • Affected crates/ADRs: /Users/lion/khive-work/shows/khive-improvement-survey/feature-frontier/synthesis.md:94, analysis.md:97.

Source: khive-improvement-survey show — proposed backlog (propose-only synthesis). Dedup: NEW.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    documentationImprovements or additions to documentation

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions