Skip to content

Perhaps append Pathoplexus WNV lineage calls #35

@j23414

Description

@j23414

Context

Compare lineages with Pathoplexus WNV lineage calls. For data quality check and consistency, do a comparison against Pathoplexus samples and lineage calls (1A, 1B, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and "unassigned"). Determine if this is a reasonable global lineage system as compared to the USA based (pre-NY, NY99, WN02, SW03).

Potential Tasks

  • Download Pathoplexus WNV lineage metadata
  • Append Pathoplexus lineage columns to ingest metadata (estimated labor to this point ~2hrs)
Screenshot 2024-10-30 at 10 55 43 AM
  • Build global phylogenetic tree, check that the lineages are reasonable
    • Global pathoplexus WNV lineages calls are stable (estimated labor ~3hrs)
    • Within the global 1A lineage, inconsistent placement of USA-based strains (pre-NY, NY99, WN02, SW03)
    • Identify potential homoplasic mutations positions causing this issue
    • Attempt masking of problematic sites
  • Decide if we can create one global Nextclade dataset or if we need to separate by lineage similar to dengue
  • Perhaps compare nextclade results against WNV typer or check their true-negative (non-WNV) is unassigned in the Nextclade dataset

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions