FR: Use repoman naming scheme where possible

[jonasstein]

we were inventing new names, but could use the same as used by repoman.
They are listed in man repoman
or here:
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/tree/repoman/man/repoman.1?id=refs/heads/repoman

[mm1ke]

good idea. Do you have some examples how it should be named?
I was thinking something like:

srctest -> ebuild.source
wwwtest -> ebuild.homepage
patchtest -> ebuild.obsolete-patch (ebuild.patch already exist)
description_over_80 -> ebuild.description
dohtml_in_eapi6 -> ebuild.dohtml-in-eapi6
leading_trailing_whitespace_${VAR} -> ebuild.whitespace-in-${VAR}

and so on...
What do you think?

[jonasstein]

sounds good. If you are unsure, the repoman developers will have better ideas, than I have.