Performance about normal map

[somnus1840]

According to the provided training instructions, the training effect of the normal map is much worse than that of the texture. May I ask what is the specific reason or are there any ways to improve it? Thanks very much！
!

[Xuanmeng-Zhang]

Hi, what is the normal maps in the training set like?

[somnus1840]

Hi, what is the normal maps in the training set like?

Thanks for your reply！


In fact, training sets about the normal map are the same as the code you provide in github, I haven't modified.

[somnus1840]

CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES= python train_3d.py --data="/home/youzehong/jt/blender-3.2.2-linux-x64/GETAvatar/datasets/THuman2.0/THuman2.0_res512/" --gpus=1 --batch=32 --batch-gpu=1 --mbstd-group=1 --gamma=10 --dmtet_scale=2 --one_3d_generator=1 --fp32=0 --img_res=512 --norm_interval=1 --dis_pose_cond=True --normal_dis_pose_cond=True --eik_weight=1e-3 --unit_2norm=True --use_normal_offset=False --blur_rgb_image=False --blur_normal_image=False --camera_type=blender --load_normal_map=True --with_sr=True --outdir="/home/youzehong/jt/GETAvatar-main/thuman_res512_ckpts/"

[Xuanmeng-Zhang]

What is the result if using ''--gpus=8 --batch=32 --batch-gpu=4 --mbstd-group=4''?

[somnus1840]

What is the result if using ''--gpus=8 --batch=32 --batch-gpu=4 --mbstd-group=4''?

Hahaha, I mainly don't have so many GPU resources, thank you for your opinion!

[Xuanmeng-Zhang]

Maybe you can increase the gamma value to see if the result is better.

[somnus1840]

Thanks, I will try it.

…

---- Replied Message ---- | From | Xuanmeng ***@***.***> | | Date | 12/12/2023 19:59 | | To | magic-research/GETAvatar ***@***.***> | | Cc | somnus1840 ***@***.***>, Author ***@***.***> | | Subject | Re: [magic-research/GETAvatar] Performance about normal map (Issue #11) | Maybe you can increase the gamma value to see if the result is better. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>