-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy paththeRoadToTheImperativeToHaskell.taskpaper
More file actions
39 lines (31 loc) · 1.94 KB
/
theRoadToTheImperativeToHaskell.taskpaper
File metadata and controls
39 lines (31 loc) · 1.94 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
Journal:
21 mai 2013 Richard, Stephane ? fine to review and give opinion
21 mai 2013 Bartozs interested on principles. he sent his talk (on Imperative! ) . I sent him the concept PDF.
22 mai 2013 skype with Tom. interested to contribute.
24 mai 2013 tom on the list yesterday.
first message to state the repo
Bartozs replied
My main concern (and I have struggled with it myself) is that if you emphasize too much the imperative side of Haskell, you will produce code that doesn’t look like regular Haskell. It’s like teaching a dialect of Haskell. Some of the examples won’t even compile without monadic IO context.
ill replied , explaiining the philosophy and approach of the book. I may have to write this down in detail and share sometime if I have more rebuke of this kind., until it becomes apparent by itself , ie need Section 1 and 3 filled…
25 mai 2013 sebastien provided some comments that lead me to update the readme , introducing level of involvement. the access to the pdf was not clear enough.
also, I discovered that lots of MD fils did not synced !
explanation was that, when inserting a new section early in the book , all MD are renamed, and need a gitt add again. found by git status @fix @done @watchout
Action:
How to collaborate ?:
- scrivener <> MD <> GitHub
- test the Md generation and GitHuB sync.
- set up a google list to talk of the book, and to have history for newcomers. @done 23 mai 2013
- basic process in readme.md @done
- licence @done
- create a repo @done
- push to Git @done
- produce a status file
- ask forum how to automate this in output
- maybe show the section number to reconcile the MD files
- produce an approach statement @maybe
- convergence and agreement needed on scope,content, (format ?)
- via negativa
- do a pedagocial roadmap, i.e. a list of topics, order it ( topological sort on deps), assign to section, find authors.
git update :
git commit -m
git push origin master